PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIF.DE vs. XS7R.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESIF.DE vs. XS7R.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIF.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESIF.DE is traded in EUR, while XS7R.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XS7R.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIF.DE achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly higher than XS7R.L's 3.50% return.


ESIF.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
3.50%
YTD
3.87%
6M
10.14%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
28.94%
5Y*
19.48%
10Y*

XS7R.L

1D
0.33%
1M
3.32%
YTD
3.50%
6M
10.30%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
26.26%
5Y*
17.44%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIF.DE vs. XS7R.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESIF.DE
iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
3.87%47.69%25.31%21.61%-2.88%29.09%3.24%
XS7R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
3.50%40.06%23.76%22.93%-2.26%35.76%2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIF.DE and XS7R.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2020

0.88

The correlation between ESIF.DE and XS7R.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESIF.DE vs. XS7R.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIF.DE
ESIF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ESIF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

XS7R.L
XS7R.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XS7R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS7R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS7R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XS7R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS7R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIF.DE vs. XS7R.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIF.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESIF.DEXS7R.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.20

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.62

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.04

5.34

+0.69

ESIF.DE vs. XS7R.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the XS7R.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIF.DE and XS7R.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESIF.DEXS7R.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.12

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.96

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.08

+1.09

Drawdowns

ESIF.DE vs. XS7R.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIF.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.93%, smaller than the maximum XS7R.L drawdown of -70.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIF.DE and XS7R.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIF.DEXS7R.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.93%

-70.94%

+48.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-11.56%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.10%

-17.71%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.93%

-23.10%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-2.30%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-31.48%

+27.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

3.50%

+0.22%

Volatility

ESIF.DE vs. XS7R.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIF.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) have volatilities of 5.37% and 5.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESIF.DEXS7R.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

5.20%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

13.46%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.99%

16.71%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.96%

19.31%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

23.63%

-4.79%

ESIF.DE vs. XS7R.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIF.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XS7R.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESIF.DE vs. XS7R.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIF.DE nor XS7R.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ESIF.DE and XS7R.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ESIF.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIF.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XS7R.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIF.DE and 0.20% for XS7R.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIF.DE and XS7R.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer