ESIE.L vs. GCED.L
ESIE.L (iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and GCED.L (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist) are both Energy Equities funds - ESIE.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while GCED.L tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIE.L returned 19.85%/yr vs -3.47%/yr for GCED.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESIE.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCED.L.
Performance
ESIE.L vs. GCED.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESIE.L is traded in GBP, while GCED.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GCED.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIE.L achieves a 34.22% return, which is significantly lower than GCED.L's 36.55% return.
ESIE.L
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- YTD
- 34.22%
- 6M
- 30.17%
- 1Y
- 59.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 19.85%
- 10Y*
- —
GCED.L
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 36.55%
- 6M
- 36.44%
- 1Y
- 88.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.34%
- 5Y*
- -3.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ESIE.L vs. GCED.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIE.L iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 34.22% | 20.13% | -9.70% | 6.04% | 44.68% | 14.52% |
GCED.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 36.55% | 31.81% | -25.26% | -15.01% | -22.48% | -20.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIE.L and GCED.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021 | 0.23 |
The correlation between ESIE.L and GCED.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESIE.L vs. GCED.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESIE.L
GCED.L
Energy
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
ESIE.L
GCED.L
Communication Services
ESIE.L
GCED.L
-
Basic Materials
ESIE.L
-
GCED.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESIE.L
-
GCED.L
Consumer Defensive
ESIE.L
-
GCED.L
Financial Services
ESIE.L
-
GCED.L
Healthcare
ESIE.L
-
GCED.L
-
Industrials
ESIE.L
-
GCED.L
Real Estate
ESIE.L
-
GCED.L
-
Technology
ESIE.L
-
GCED.L
Utilities
ESIE.L
-
GCED.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIE.L vs. GCED.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESIE.L
GCED.L
ESIE.L vs. GCED.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIE.L | GCED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.63 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | 8.02 | -3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.82 | 26.75 | -11.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIE.L | GCED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 4.04 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | -0.13 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | -0.24 | +1.09 |
Drawdowns
ESIE.L vs. GCED.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.35%, smaller than the maximum GCED.L drawdown of -69.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIE.L and GCED.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIE.L | GCED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.35% | -69.62% | +42.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -11.00% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.35% | -52.78% | +25.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.35% | -68.49% | +41.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.99% | -29.25% | +22.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -40.59% | +32.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 3.30% | +0.69% |
Volatility
ESIE.L vs. GCED.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L) is 8.04%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L) has a volatility of 8.74%. This indicates that ESIE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCED.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIE.L | GCED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 8.74% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.18% | 15.24% | +3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.92% | 21.85% | +1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.32% | 26.40% | -2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 27.02% | -2.44% |
ESIE.L vs. GCED.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIE.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GCED.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESIE.L vs. GCED.L - Dividend Comparison
ESIE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GCED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIE.L iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCED.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 1.53% | 2.09% | 1.43% | 0.68% | 0.09% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIE.L and GCED.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCED.L.
ESIE.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while GCED.L tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIE.L and 0.60% for GCED.L.
Find the right allocation for ESIE.L and GCED.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer