ESIC.L vs. SWDA.L
ESIC.L (iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIC.L is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIC.L returned -1.55%/yr vs 13.06%/yr for SWDA.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIC.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SWDA.L.
Performance
ESIC.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESIC.L is traded in GBP, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIC.L achieves a -11.67% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 10.08% return.
ESIC.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- -11.67%
- 6M
- -11.51%
- 1Y
- -3.34%
- 3Y*
- -2.82%
- 5Y*
- -1.55%
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 27.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
ESIC.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIC.L iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -11.67% | 7.11% | -1.15% | 12.93% | -11.01% | 14.25% | 5.78% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.08% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 2.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIC.L and SWDA.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between ESIC.L and SWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESIC.L vs. SWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESIC.L
SWDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESIC.L
SWDA.L
Technology
ESIC.L
SWDA.L
Communication Services
ESIC.L
SWDA.L
Industrials
ESIC.L
SWDA.L
Basic Materials
ESIC.L
-
SWDA.L
Consumer Defensive
ESIC.L
-
SWDA.L
Energy
ESIC.L
-
SWDA.L
Financial Services
ESIC.L
-
SWDA.L
Healthcare
ESIC.L
-
SWDA.L
Real Estate
ESIC.L
-
SWDA.L
Utilities
ESIC.L
-
SWDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIC.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESIC.L
SWDA.L
ESIC.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIC.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.51 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 4.14 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.35 | 16.55 | -16.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIC.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 | 2.66 | -2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.98 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.88 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
ESIC.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIC.L drawdown since its inception was -28.93%, which is greater than SWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIC.L and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIC.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.93% | -25.58% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.82% | -6.55% | -15.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -18.50% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.93% | -18.50% | -10.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.64% | -0.10% | -15.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.39% | -3.49% | -5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.50% | 1.64% | +7.86% |
Volatility
ESIC.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.52%. This indicates that ESIC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIC.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | 2.52% | +3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.17% | 7.29% | +7.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.03% | 10.19% | +8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 13.30% | +7.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 14.50% | +5.87% |
ESIC.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIC.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESIC.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESIC.L nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIC.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIC.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIC.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.
ESIC.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. ESIC.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIC.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for ESIC.L and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer