ESIC.L vs. FRQX.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ESIC.L (iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and FRQX.L (Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIC.L is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while FRQX.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIC.L returned -1.55%/yr vs 14.74%/yr for FRQX.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESIC.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FRQX.L.

Performance

ESIC.L vs. FRQX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L) and Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIC.L achieves a -11.67% return, which is significantly lower than FRQX.L's 43.69% return.

ESIC.L

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 7.15%
• YTD: -11.67%
• 6M: -11.51%
• 1Y: -3.34%
• 3Y*: -2.82%
• 5Y*: -1.55%
• 10Y*: —

FRQX.L

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: 10.47%
• YTD: 43.69%
• 6M: 48.15%
• 1Y: 78.41%
• 3Y*: 26.02%
• 5Y*: 14.74%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIC.L vs. FRQX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ESIC.L iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	-11.67%	7.11%	-1.15%	12.93%	-11.01%	14.25%	5.78%
FRQX.L Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF	43.69%	21.13%	9.39%	5.79%	-2.53%	5.94%	1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIC.L and FRQX.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020	0.42

The correlation between ESIC.L and FRQX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESIC.L vs. FRQX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESIC.L	FRQX.L
Consumer Cyclical	95.6%	4.6%
Technology	2.9%	54.7%
Communication Services	1.0%	2.4%
Industrials	0.5%	8.9%
Basic Materials	-	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.2%
Energy	-	2.3%
Financial Services	-	15.6%
Healthcare	-	2.2%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Utilities	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

ESIC.L vs. FRQX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIC.L

ESIC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7
ESIC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ESIC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
ESIC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
ESIC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
ESIC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7

FRQX.L

FRQX.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
FRQX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FRQX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FRQX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FRQX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FRQX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIC.L vs. FRQX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L) and Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESIC.L	FRQX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	4.05	-4.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.12	5.31	-5.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.71	-0.73
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.15	5.97	-6.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.35	23.58	-23.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESIC.L vs. FRQX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIC.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the FRQX.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIC.L and FRQX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESIC.L	FRQX.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17	4.05	-4.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	1.00	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.65	-0.54

Drawdowns

ESIC.L vs. FRQX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIC.L drawdown since its inception was -28.93%, which is greater than FRQX.L's maximum drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIC.L and FRQX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESIC.L	FRQX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.93%	-20.77%	-8.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.82%	-13.07%	-8.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.39%	-19.42%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.93%	-19.42%	-9.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.64%	-2.56%	-13.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.39%	-3.94%	-5.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.50%	3.31%	+6.19%

Volatility

ESIC.L vs. FRQX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L) is 6.36%, while Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that ESIC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRQX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESIC.L	FRQX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.36%	7.40%	-1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.17%	16.78%	-1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.03%	19.27%	-0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.84%	14.77%	+6.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.37%	16.44%	+3.93%

ESIC.L vs. FRQX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIC.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQX.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESIC.L vs. FRQX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIC.L nor FRQX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESIC.L and FRQX.L in my portfolio?

ESIC.L and FRQX.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESIC.L or FRQX.L?

On fees, ESIC.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESIC.L or FRQX.L?

ESIC.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FRQX.L.

What is the main difference between ESIC.L and FRQX.L?

ESIC.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FRQX.L is Asia Pacific Equities. ESIC.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while FRQX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIC.L and 0.40% for FRQX.L.