PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGY.TO vs. ZUQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGY.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO) and BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ESGY.TO having a 11.92% return and ZUQ.TO slightly lower at 11.73%.


ESGY.TO

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.99%
6M
8.99%
YTD
11.92%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
15.28%
10Y*

ZUQ.TO

1D
-1.61%
1M
0.85%
6M
8.55%
YTD
11.73%
1Y
17.38%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
16.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGY.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESGY.TO
BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF
11.92%13.67%33.83%26.54%-15.46%30.67%11.27%
ZUQ.TO
BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF
11.73%5.80%34.06%33.29%-18.30%26.45%14.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGY.TO and ZUQ.TO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.65

The correlation between ESGY.TO and ZUQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.79 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESGY.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGY.TO
ZUQ.TO

Technology

39.6%
35.9%

Communication Services

13.7%
14.0%

Financial Services

10.0%
9.8%

Healthcare

9.7%
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
2.6%

Industrials

7.7%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
10.3%

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.5%

Energy

1.9%
0.2%

Utilities

1.0%
0.1%

Technology

ESGY.TO
39.6%
ZUQ.TO
35.9%

Communication Services

ESGY.TO
13.7%
ZUQ.TO
14.0%

Financial Services

ESGY.TO
10.0%
ZUQ.TO
9.8%

Healthcare

ESGY.TO
9.7%
ZUQ.TO
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGY.TO
8.5%
ZUQ.TO
2.6%

Industrials

ESGY.TO
7.7%
ZUQ.TO
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

ESGY.TO
4.0%
ZUQ.TO
10.3%

Real Estate

ESGY.TO
2.1%
ZUQ.TO

-

Basic Materials

ESGY.TO
2.0%
ZUQ.TO
1.5%

Energy

ESGY.TO
1.9%
ZUQ.TO
0.2%

Utilities

ESGY.TO
1.0%
ZUQ.TO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGY.TO vs. ZUQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGY.TO
ESGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ESGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

ZUQ.TO
ZUQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
ZUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGY.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO) and BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGY.TOZUQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.65

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.92

5.34

+3.59

ESGY.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the ZUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGY.TO and ZUQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGY.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.36%, roughly equal to the maximum ZUQ.TO drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGY.TO and ZUQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGY.TOZUQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.36%

-26.93%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-10.57%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.83%

-17.93%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.89%

-26.93%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-2.99%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-4.54%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.27%

-0.34%

Volatility

ESGY.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO) is 2.85%, while BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that ESGY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZUQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGY.TOZUQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

3.51%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

9.22%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

12.69%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.61%

16.40%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

17.53%

-0.71%

Dividends

ESGY.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ESGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than ZUQ.TO's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGY.TO
BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF
0.62%0.66%0.79%1.16%1.34%1.12%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZUQ.TO
BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF
0.44%0.48%0.60%0.90%1.03%0.83%1.00%1.00%1.12%1.25%1.26%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGY.TO and ZUQ.TO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGY.TO and ZUQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer