PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGY.TO vs. XUU-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGY.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESGY.TO is traded in CAD, while XUU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGY.TO achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than XUU-U.TO's 12.31% return.


ESGY.TO

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.88%
6M
7.44%
YTD
9.51%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
14.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.76%

XUU-U.TO

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.22%
6M
10.18%
YTD
12.31%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$61.83KCA$62.00KCA$52.95K
CA$247.16KCA$315.04KCA$275.08K

ESGY.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESGY.TO
BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF
9.51%13.67%33.83%26.54%-15.46%30.67%11.27%
XUU-U.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF
12.31%11.40%33.28%23.90%-15.09%28.35%16.32%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGY.TO and XUU-U.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.36

Over the past year, ESGY.TO and XUU-U.TO have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGY.TO vs. XUU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGY.TO
ESGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ESGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

XUU-U.TO
XUU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XUU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGY.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGY.TOXUU-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.40

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.94

8.98

-2.04

ESGY.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the XUU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGY.TO and XUU-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGY.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.36%, which is greater than XUU-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGY.TO and XUU-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGY.TOXUU-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.36%

-24.00%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-9.04%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.83%

-20.43%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.89%

-22.44%

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-2.68%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

-4.79%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.41%

+0.55%

Volatility

ESGY.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) at 3.01%. This indicates that ESGY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGY.TOXUU-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

3.01%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

10.49%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

13.16%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.61%

17.28%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

18.01%

-1.20%

ESGY.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGY.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than XUU-U.TO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGY.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

ESGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than XUU-U.TO's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ESGY.TO
BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF
0.63%0.66%0.79%1.16%1.34%1.12%1.44%
XUU-U.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF
1.06%1.15%1.05%1.14%1.32%0.97%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGY.TO and XUU-U.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUU-U.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUU-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for ESGY.TO.

ESGY.TO tracks MSCI USA Selection Index, while XUU-U.TO tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for ESGY.TO and 0.08% for XUU-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGY.TO and XUU-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer