ESGY.TO vs. XMU.TO
ESGY.TO (BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF) and XMU.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ESGY.TO returned 16.24%/yr vs 7.85%/yr for XMU.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESGY.TO vs. XMU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGY.TO achieves a 13.25% return, which is significantly higher than XMU.TO's 6.19% return.
ESGY.TO
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 13.25%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 28.69%
- 3Y*
- 23.63%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- —
XMU.TO
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 6M
- 5.54%
- 1Y
- 4.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
ESGY.TO vs. XMU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGY.TO BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF | 13.25% | 13.67% | 33.83% | 26.54% | -15.46% | 30.67% | 11.27% |
XMU.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF | 6.19% | -0.80% | 22.08% | 6.68% | -3.58% | 17.10% | -1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGY.TO and XMU.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGY.TO vs. XMU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ESGY.TO
XMU.TO
ESGY.TO vs. XMU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGY.TO | XMU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.09 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 0.55 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | 1.13 | +8.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGY.TO vs. XMU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.36%, roughly equal to the maximum XMU.TO drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGY.TO and XMU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGY.TO | XMU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.36% | -27.31% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.62% | -8.45% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.83% | -10.97% | -9.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.89% | -20.59% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.75% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -4.54% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 4.10% | -1.18% |
Volatility
ESGY.TO vs. XMU.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGY.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO) at 2.66%. This indicates that ESGY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGY.TO | XMU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 2.66% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 6.36% | +3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.77% | 10.24% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 14.67% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 17.08% | -0.21% |
Dividends
ESGY.TO vs. XMU.TO - Dividend Comparison
ESGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than XMU.TO's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGY.TO BMO MSCI USA Selection Equity Index ETF | 0.61% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 1.16% | 1.34% | 1.12% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMU.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF | 1.14% | 1.13% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.17% | 1.09% | 1.72% | 1.47% | 1.51% | 1.63% | 1.87% | 1.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGY.TO and XMU.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares.
Find the right allocation for ESGY.TO and XMU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer