PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGV vs. DMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGV vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGV achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.42% return.


ESGV

1D
-0.88%
1M
6.08%
YTD
10.74%
6M
10.73%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.27%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*

DMAY

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.30%
YTD
4.42%
6M
5.19%
1Y
12.37%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGV vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
10.74%16.48%24.69%30.79%-24.04%26.55%33.48%
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
4.42%11.05%12.82%15.40%-9.98%6.14%6.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGV and DMAY is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020

0.90

The correlation between ESGV and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGV vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGV
DMAY

Technology

39.5%
36.2%

Communication Services

13.0%
10.9%

Financial Services

12.3%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.8%
8.4%

Industrials

4.5%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.9%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.8%

Utilities

0.2%
2.3%

Energy

0.1%
3.5%

Technology

ESGV
39.5%
DMAY
36.2%

Communication Services

ESGV
13.0%
DMAY
10.9%

Financial Services

ESGV
12.3%
DMAY
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGV
12.2%
DMAY
10.1%

Healthcare

ESGV
9.8%
DMAY
8.4%

Industrials

ESGV
4.5%
DMAY
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

ESGV
3.9%
DMAY
4.9%

Real Estate

ESGV
2.8%
DMAY
1.9%

Basic Materials

ESGV
1.9%
DMAY
1.8%

Utilities

ESGV
0.2%
DMAY
2.3%

Energy

ESGV
0.1%
DMAY
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGV vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAY
DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGV vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGVDMAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.60

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

3.73

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

22.76

-12.34

ESGV vs. DMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the DMAY Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGV and DMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGVDMAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.65

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.80

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.88

-0.15

Drawdowns

ESGV vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGV drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGV and DMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGVDMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.66%

-13.90%

-19.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-3.36%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.41%

-12.38%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

-13.90%

-14.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-0.30%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-2.24%

-4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

0.55%

+2.15%

Volatility

ESGV vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.84%. This indicates that ESGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGVDMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

0.84%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

3.74%

+6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

4.73%

+8.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

9.02%

+9.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

8.43%

+12.15%

ESGV vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGV vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison

ESGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
0.85%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ESGV and DMAY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ESGV has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGV dropped -33.66% vs DMAY's -13.90%.

On 5-year performance, ESGV leads with 12.64% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGV has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.

ESGV has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.

ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGV and 0.85% for DMAY.

DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGV and DMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer