ESGV vs. DMAY
ESGV (Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ESGV tracks the FTSE US All Cap Choice Index while DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGV returned 12.64%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
ESGV vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGV achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.42% return.
ESGV
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.64%
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGV vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF | 10.74% | 16.48% | 24.69% | 30.79% | -24.04% | 26.55% | 33.48% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.42% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 6.14% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGV and DMAY is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ESGV and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGV vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGV
DMAY
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
ESGV
DMAY
Communication Services
ESGV
DMAY
Financial Services
ESGV
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
ESGV
DMAY
Healthcare
ESGV
DMAY
Industrials
ESGV
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
ESGV
DMAY
Real Estate
ESGV
DMAY
Basic Materials
ESGV
DMAY
Utilities
ESGV
DMAY
Energy
ESGV
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGV vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
ESGV
DMAY
ESGV vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGV | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.60 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 3.73 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.42 | 22.76 | -12.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGV | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.65 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.80 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.88 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
ESGV vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGV drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGV and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGV | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.66% | -13.90% | -19.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.60% | -3.36% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.41% | -12.38% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.81% | -13.90% | -14.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -0.30% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -2.24% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 0.55% | +2.15% |
Volatility
ESGV vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.84%. This indicates that ESGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGV | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 0.84% | +2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.18% | 3.74% | +6.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.35% | 4.73% | +8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 9.02% | +9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 8.43% | +12.15% |
ESGV vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGV vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
ESGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF | 0.85% | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.16% | 1.42% | 0.95% | 1.11% | 1.27% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ESGV and DMAY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ESGV has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGV dropped -33.66% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 5-year performance, ESGV leads with 12.64% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGV has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
ESGV has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGV and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGV and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer