ESGV vs. DMAY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ESGV (Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ESGV tracks the FTSE US All Cap Choice Index while DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGV returned 11.61%/yr vs 6.78%/yr for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.

Performance

ESGV vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGV achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 3.36% return.

ESGV

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 7.75%
• 6M: 6.70%
• 1Y: 23.45%
• 3Y*: 20.58%
• 5Y*: 11.61%
• 10Y*: —

DMAY

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -0.40%
• YTD: 3.36%
• 6M: 3.37%
• 1Y: 10.73%
• 3Y*: 11.27%
• 5Y*: 6.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGV vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF	7.75%	16.48%	24.69%	30.79%	-24.04%	26.55%	37.39%
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May	3.36%	11.05%	12.82%	15.40%	-9.98%	6.14%	6.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGV and DMAY is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020	0.90

The correlation between ESGV and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGV vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESGV	DMAY
Technology	43.0%	39.0%
Communication Services	12.2%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.7%	9.9%
Financial Services	11.4%	11.1%
Healthcare	9.5%	8.3%
Industrials	4.2%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	4.5%
Real Estate	2.6%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.7%
Utilities	0.2%	2.1%
Energy	0.1%	3.1%

Return for Risk

ESGV vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGV

ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 48
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 49
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 51

DMAY

DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 78
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGV vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESGV	DMAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	2.14	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	3.13	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.47	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	3.23	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.48	18.05	-9.57

ESGV vs. DMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGV Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the DMAY Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGV and DMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESGV vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGV drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGV and DMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGV	DMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.66%	-13.90%	-19.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.60%	-3.36%	-8.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.41%	-12.38%	-8.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.81%	-13.90%	-14.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.56%	-1.31%	-2.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.40%	-2.23%	-4.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	0.60%	+2.17%

Volatility

ESGV vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 2.26%. This indicates that ESGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESGV	DMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.61%	2.26%	+3.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.26%	4.30%	+6.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.15%	5.09%	+9.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.48%	9.07%	+9.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.60%	8.43%	+12.17%

ESGV vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESGV vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison

ESGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF	0.89%	0.91%	1.04%	1.16%	1.42%	0.95%	1.11%	1.27%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESGV and DMAY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, ESGV and DMAY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ESGV or DMAY?

ESGV has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to DMAY (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGV dropped -33.66% vs DMAY's -13.90%.

Which ETF is better, ESGV or DMAY?

On 5-year performance, ESGV leads with 11.61% vs 6.78% for DMAY. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ESGV or DMAY?

Over the 5-year period, ESGV has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 6.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESGV or DMAY?

ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESGV or DMAY?

ESGV has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.

What is the main difference between ESGV and DMAY?

ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGV and 0.85% for DMAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.