ESGU vs. DMAY
ESGU (iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ESGU tracks the MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index while DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGU returned 12.74%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
ESGU vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGU achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.42% return.
ESGU
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.74%
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGU vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGU iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF | 11.06% | 16.90% | 24.31% | 25.79% | -20.27% | 26.89% | 30.87% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.42% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 6.14% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGU and DMAY is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ESGU and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGU vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGU
DMAY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
ESGU
DMAY
Financial Services
ESGU
DMAY
Communication Services
ESGU
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
ESGU
DMAY
Healthcare
ESGU
DMAY
Industrials
ESGU
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
ESGU
DMAY
Energy
ESGU
DMAY
Utilities
ESGU
DMAY
Real Estate
ESGU
DMAY
Basic Materials
ESGU
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGU vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
ESGU
DMAY
ESGU vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.60 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.73 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.75 | 22.76 | -9.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.65 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.80 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.88 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
ESGU vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGU drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGU and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.87% | -13.90% | -19.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.26% | -3.36% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.32% | -12.38% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.15% | -13.90% | -12.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -0.30% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -2.24% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 0.55% | +1.48% |
Volatility
ESGU vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.84%. This indicates that ESGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 0.84% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | 3.74% | +5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 4.73% | +7.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 9.02% | +8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 8.43% | +10.17% |
ESGU vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGU vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
ESGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESGU iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.18% | 1.43% | 1.58% | 1.06% | 1.27% | 1.32% | 1.73% | 1.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ESGU and DMAY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ESGU has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGU dropped -33.87% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 5-year performance, ESGU leads with 12.74% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, ESGU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGU has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESGU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
ESGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
ESGU tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESGU and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGU and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer