ESGL.L vs. CEUR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ESGL.L (Lyxor MSCI Europe ESG Leaders (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and CEUR.L (Amundi MSCI Europe) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGL.L returned 8.78%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for CEUR.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for CEUR.L.

Performance

ESGL.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Europe ESG Leaders (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (ESGL.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ESGL.L is traded in GBP, while CEUR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CEUR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGL.L achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly higher than CEUR.L's 6.66% return.

ESGL.L

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 8.65%
• 6M: 10.47%
• 1Y: 19.77%
• 3Y*: 11.78%
• 5Y*: 8.78%
• 10Y*: —

CEUR.L

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 3.94%
• YTD: 6.66%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: 13.68%
• 5Y*: 9.47%
• 10Y*: 9.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGL.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ESGL.L Lyxor MSCI Europe ESG Leaders (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	8.65%	19.00%	2.42%	13.82%	-6.20%	16.59%	6.21%	1.39%
CEUR.L Amundi MSCI Europe	6.66%	24.46%	4.90%	12.93%	-5.96%	17.02%	2.29%	13.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGL.L and CEUR.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2019	0.94

The correlation between ESGL.L and CEUR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGL.L vs. CEUR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESGL.L	CEUR.L
Financial Services	23.8%	25.1%
Industrials	20.2%	19.8%
Healthcare	14.7%	13.8%
Technology	13.4%	10.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	7.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	6.2%
Utilities	5.5%	5.3%
Communication Services	4.2%	3.4%
Basic Materials	3.7%	3.8%
Real Estate	1.2%	1.7%
Energy	0.1%	3.5%

Return for Risk

ESGL.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGL.L

ESGL.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
ESGL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ESGL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ESGL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ESGL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
ESGL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

CEUR.L

CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGL.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Europe ESG Leaders (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (ESGL.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESGL.L	CEUR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.54	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.18	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.29	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	1.74	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.22	6.06	+0.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESGL.L vs. CEUR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGL.L and CEUR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESGL.L	CEUR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	1.54	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.68	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.56	-0.12

Drawdowns

ESGL.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, which is greater than CEUR.L's maximum drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGL.L and CEUR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGL.L	CEUR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.24%	-28.63%	-5.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.50%	-11.05%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.11%	-12.66%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.06%	-17.85%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-1.52%	+0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.85%	-4.58%	-1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	3.17%	0.00%

Volatility

ESGL.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Europe ESG Leaders (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (ESGL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) at 4.25%. This indicates that ESGL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESGL.L	CEUR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	4.25%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.05%	10.53%	+0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.12%	12.44%	+0.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.61%	13.88%	+3.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.54%	14.97%	+3.57%

ESGL.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ESGL.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESGL.L nor CEUR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESGL.L and CEUR.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, ESGL.L and CEUR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ESGL.L or CEUR.L?

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESGL.L or CEUR.L?

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ESGL.L.

What is the main difference between ESGL.L and CEUR.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESGL.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.