PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ESGG.TO vs. ZNQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ESGG.TO vs. ZNQ.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

ESGG.TO (BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF) and ZNQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGG.TO is a Global Equities fund managed by BMO, while ZNQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, ESGG.TO returned 14.54%/yr vs 19.23%/yr for ZNQ.TO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

ESGG.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGG.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGG.TO achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly lower than ZNQ.TO's 23.99% return.

ESGG.TO

1D
1.89%
1M
3.45%
YTD
13.51%
6M
12.68%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
—

ZNQ.TO

1D
1.63%
1M
2.62%
YTD
23.99%
6M
23.16%
1Y
39.20%
3Y*
29.08%
5Y*
19.23%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGG.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESGG.TO
BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF		13.51%15.44%27.08%23.34%-14.25%23.71%8.86%
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF		23.99%14.95%35.84%51.32%-28.06%26.59%36.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG.TO and ZNQ.TO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.54

The correlation between ESGG.TO and ZNQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF

BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF

Often compared with ZNQ.TO:
ZNQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TOZNQ.TO vs. QQC.TOZNQ.TO vs. HXQ.TOZNQ.TO vs. TEC.TOZNQ.TO vs. VFV.TOZNQ.TO vs. QQQZNQ.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Return for Risk

ESGG.TO vs. ZNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ESGG.TO
ESGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ESGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO
ZNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGG.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGG.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ESGG.TOZNQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.33
2.22

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.37
2.90

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.22

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

10.03

+1.70

ESGG.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG.TO and ZNQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGG.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.90%, smaller than the maximum ZNQ.TO drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG.TO and ZNQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ESGG.TOZNQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.90%

-32.09%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.27%

-12.24%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.79%

-22.67%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.31%

-32.09%

+6.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.30%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-6.59%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

3.92%

-1.59%

Volatility

ESGG.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGG.TO) is 3.91%, while BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that ESGG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ESGG.TOZNQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

9.27%

-5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

14.58%

-4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.74%

17.76%

-6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

21.15%

-6.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

22.46%

-6.08%

Dividends

ESGG.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ESGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than ZNQ.TO's 0.20% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ESGG.TO
BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF		0.86%1.01%1.20%1.56%1.82%1.53%1.87%0.00%
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF		0.20%0.25%0.30%0.35%0.23%0.12%0.47%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

ESGG.TO and ZNQ.TO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGG.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while ZNQ.TO is Nasdaq-100.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGG.TO and ZNQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer