PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ESGG.TO vs. XDGH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ESGG.TO vs. XDGH.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

ESGG.TO (BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF) and XDGH.TO (iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ESGG.TO returned 14.54%/yr vs 8.97%/yr for XDGH.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ESGG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGG.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGG.TO achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly higher than XDGH.TO's 9.14% return.

ESGG.TO

1D
1.89%
1M
3.45%
YTD
13.51%
6M
12.68%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
—

XDGH.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.13%
YTD
9.14%
6M
9.25%
1Y
19.25%
3Y*
13.03%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESGG.TO
BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF		13.51%15.44%27.08%23.34%-14.25%23.71%8.86%
XDGH.TO
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		9.14%14.60%10.49%9.52%-1.31%15.69%-5.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG.TO and XDGH.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF

iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XDGH.TO:
XDGH.TO vs. XDG.TOXDGH.TO vs. XHD.TOXDGH.TO vs. XEQT.TOXDGH.TO vs. XDUH.TOXDGH.TO vs. VFV.TOXDGH.TO vs. VIDY.TOXDGH.TO vs. VDY.TO

Return for Risk

ESGG.TO vs. XDGH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ESGG.TO
ESGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ESGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO
XDGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XDGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGG.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ESGG.TOXDGH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.33
2.03

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.37
3.06

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.36

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.03

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

9.04

+2.69

ESGG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the XDGH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG.TO and XDGH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.90%, smaller than the maximum XDGH.TO drawdown of -34.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG.TO and XDGH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ESGG.TOXDGH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.90%

-34.91%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.27%

-6.38%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.79%

-11.96%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.31%

-16.06%

-9.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.44%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-4.63%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.13%

+0.20%

Volatility

ESGG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF (ESGG.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO) at 2.05%. This indicates that ESGG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDGH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ESGG.TOXDGH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

2.05%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

6.82%

+2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.74%

9.55%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

14.41%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

23.39%

-7.01%

Dividends

ESGG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Dividend Comparison

ESGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than XDGH.TO's 2.78% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGG.TO
BMO MSCI Global Selection Equity Index ETF		0.86%1.01%1.20%1.56%1.82%1.53%1.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDGH.TO
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.78%2.81%3.04%3.41%3.20%3.13%3.35%2.92%3.40%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

ESGG.TO and XDGH.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGG.TO and XDGH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer