PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGG.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGG.L achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly lower than X7PP.L's 17.34% return.


ESGG.L

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.10%
6M
10.14%
YTD
10.54%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
11.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.86%

X7PP.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
4.35%
6M
11.84%
YTD
17.34%
1Y
48.04%
3Y*
43.87%
5Y*
31.62%
10Y*
16.63%
ALL TIME*
11.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
£17.70K£131.17K£72.51K
£550.80K£551.73K£715.08K

ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESGG.L
Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
10.54%12.19%20.44%18.59%-10.70%24.45%14.92%-13.64%
X7PP.L
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF
17.34%87.77%27.07%23.27%6.04%29.16%-18.50%6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG.L and X7PP.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.51

The correlation between ESGG.L and X7PP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGG.L
X7PP.L

Technology

32.7%

-

Financial Services

19.3%
100.0%

Industrials

10.0%

-

Healthcare

9.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%

-

Communication Services

6.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Energy

2.6%

-

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Technology

ESGG.L
32.7%
X7PP.L

-

Financial Services

ESGG.L
19.3%
X7PP.L
100.0%

Industrials

ESGG.L
10.0%
X7PP.L

-

Healthcare

ESGG.L
9.4%
X7PP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

ESGG.L
7.7%
X7PP.L

-

Communication Services

ESGG.L
6.4%
X7PP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

ESGG.L
4.8%
X7PP.L

-

Basic Materials

ESGG.L
3.2%
X7PP.L

-

Energy

ESGG.L
2.6%
X7PP.L

-

Utilities

ESGG.L
2.1%
X7PP.L

-

Real Estate

ESGG.L
2.0%
X7PP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGG.L
ESGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ESGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

X7PP.L
X7PP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGG.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGG.LX7PP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.00

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.27

9.99

+0.28

ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG.L and X7PP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG.L drawdown since its inception was -29.72%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG.L and X7PP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGG.LX7PP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.72%

-56.28%

+26.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-15.94%

+8.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-18.17%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.64%

-30.79%

+12.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-0.64%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-15.24%

+9.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

4.80%

-2.92%

Volatility

ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGG.L) is 3.26%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that ESGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGG.LX7PP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

6.42%

-3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

18.82%

-10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

22.21%

-11.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.54%

23.46%

-9.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

24.25%

-7.60%

ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGG.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than X7PP.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESGG.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGG.L and X7PP.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESGG.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESGG.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.

ESGG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while X7PP.L is Financials Equities. ESGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESGG.L and 0.20% for X7PP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGG.L and X7PP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer