ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L
ESGG.L (Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGG.L returned 11.60%/yr vs 31.62%/yr for X7PP.L. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ESGG.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for X7PP.L.
Performance
ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGG.L achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly lower than X7PP.L's 17.34% return.
ESGG.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.86%
X7PP.L
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- YTD
- 17.34%
- 1Y
- 48.04%
- 3Y*
- 43.87%
- 5Y*
- 31.62%
- 10Y*
- 16.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| £17.70K | £131.17K | £72.51K | |
| £550.80K | £551.73K | £715.08K |
ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG.L Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 10.54% | 12.19% | 20.44% | 18.59% | -10.70% | 24.45% | 14.92% | -13.64% |
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 17.34% | 87.77% | 27.07% | 23.27% | 6.04% | 29.16% | -18.50% | 6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGG.L and X7PP.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.51 |
The correlation between ESGG.L and X7PP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGG.L
X7PP.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
ESGG.L
X7PP.L
-
Financial Services
ESGG.L
X7PP.L
Industrials
ESGG.L
X7PP.L
-
Healthcare
ESGG.L
X7PP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESGG.L
X7PP.L
-
Communication Services
ESGG.L
X7PP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ESGG.L
X7PP.L
-
Basic Materials
ESGG.L
X7PP.L
-
Energy
ESGG.L
X7PP.L
-
Utilities
ESGG.L
X7PP.L
-
Real Estate
ESGG.L
X7PP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESGG.L
X7PP.L
ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGG.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGG.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 3.00 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.27 | 9.99 | +0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGG.L drawdown since its inception was -29.72%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG.L and X7PP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGG.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.72% | -56.28% | +26.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.11% | -15.94% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.64% | -18.17% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.64% | -30.79% | +12.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -0.64% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -15.24% | +9.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 4.80% | -2.92% |
Volatility
ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGG.L) is 3.26%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that ESGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGG.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 6.42% | -3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 18.82% | -10.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.14% | 22.21% | -11.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 23.46% | -9.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 24.25% | -7.60% |
ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGG.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than X7PP.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESGG.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESGG.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGG.L and X7PP.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESGG.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGG.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.
ESGG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while X7PP.L is Financials Equities. ESGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESGG.L and 0.20% for X7PP.L.
Find the right allocation for ESGG.L and X7PP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer