ESGG.L vs. INFR.L
ESGG.L (Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and INFR.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while INFR.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGG.L returned 12.71%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for INFR.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESGG.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INFR.L.
Performance
ESGG.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGG.L achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly higher than INFR.L's 9.52% return.
ESGG.L
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 10.86%
- 1Y
- 26.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- —
INFR.L
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 16.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
ESGG.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG.L Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 10.66% | 12.19% | 20.44% | 19.21% | -11.17% | 22.81% | 9.98% |
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 9.52% | 5.90% | 11.49% | -4.96% | 5.77% | 19.54% | -10.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGG.L and INFR.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2020 | 0.25 |
The correlation between ESGG.L and INFR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.27 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESGG.L vs. INFR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGG.L
INFR.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
ESGG.L
INFR.L
Financial Services
ESGG.L
INFR.L
Industrials
ESGG.L
INFR.L
Healthcare
ESGG.L
INFR.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESGG.L
INFR.L
-
Communication Services
ESGG.L
INFR.L
Consumer Defensive
ESGG.L
INFR.L
-
Basic Materials
ESGG.L
INFR.L
-
Energy
ESGG.L
INFR.L
Real Estate
ESGG.L
INFR.L
Utilities
ESGG.L
INFR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGG.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESGG.L
INFR.L
ESGG.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGG.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGG.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.27 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 3.13 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.88 | 7.96 | +6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGG.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 1.55 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.62 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.52 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
ESGG.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.30%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG.L and INFR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGG.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.30% | -34.25% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.11% | -5.19% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.64% | -11.08% | -7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.64% | -22.87% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -3.70% | +3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -6.12% | +3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 2.04% | -0.23% |
Volatility
ESGG.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESGG.L) is 2.87%, while iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that ESGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGG.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 3.92% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.87% | 8.92% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.64% | 10.49% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 12.26% | +3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 14.10% | +5.62% |
ESGG.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGG.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGG.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison
ESGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG.L Invesco MSCI World ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 3.02% | 2.54% | 2.60% | 2.84% | 2.70% | 2.99% | 3.51% | 3.45% | 4.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGG.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESGG.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGG.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.
ESGG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. ESGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESGG.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.
Find the right allocation for ESGG.L and INFR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer