ESGC.TO vs. CDZ.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ESGC.TO (Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF) and CDZ.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - ESGC.TO tracks the S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index while CDZ.TO tracks the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGC.TO returned 13.73%/yr vs 10.31%/yr for CDZ.TO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESGC.TO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for CDZ.TO.

Performance

ESGC.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (ESGC.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGC.TO achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly lower than CDZ.TO's 13.46% return.

ESGC.TO

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 4.89%
• YTD: 12.27%
• 6M: 14.01%
• 1Y: 34.84%
• 3Y*: 22.81%
• 5Y*: 13.73%
• 10Y*: —

CDZ.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 13.46%
• 6M: 10.74%
• 1Y: 22.32%
• 3Y*: 16.81%
• 5Y*: 10.31%
• 10Y*: 9.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGC.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ESGC.TO Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF	12.27%	32.85%	18.64%	7.50%	-7.28%	23.99%	5.27%
CDZ.TO iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF	13.46%	13.45%	17.86%	8.98%	-4.43%	22.80%	8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGC.TO and CDZ.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2020	0.54

The correlation between ESGC.TO and CDZ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ESGC.TO vs. CDZ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGC.TO

ESGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
ESGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ESGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ESGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
ESGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
ESGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

CDZ.TO

CDZ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 84
CDZ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CDZ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
CDZ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CDZ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CDZ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGC.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (ESGC.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESGC.TO	CDZ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	2.72	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.81	3.53	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.56	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	5.46	-2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.05	18.49	-3.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESGC.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the CDZ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGC.TO and CDZ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESGC.TO	CDZ.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	2.72	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.09	0.95	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.26	0.52	+0.73

Drawdowns

ESGC.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGC.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.66%, smaller than the maximum CDZ.TO drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGC.TO and CDZ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGC.TO	CDZ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.66%	-49.33%	+32.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.14%	-4.11%	-6.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.51%	-12.99%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.66%	-17.15%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-0.09%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-6.14%	+2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	1.21%	+1.11%

Volatility

ESGC.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (ESGC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ.TO) at 1.88%. This indicates that ESGC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDZ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESGC.TO	CDZ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.19%	1.88%	+2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.53%	6.91%	+3.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.40%	8.26%	+4.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.67%	10.86%	+1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.73%	14.63%	-1.90%

ESGC.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGC.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CDZ.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESGC.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ESGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than CDZ.TO's 3.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDZ.TO iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF	3.07%	3.46%	3.56%	3.71%	3.67%	2.95%	3.70%	3.68%	4.37%	3.43%	3.51%	3.72%
ESGC.TO Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF	2.13%	2.34%	2.60%	3.23%	2.98%	2.28%	0.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESGC.TO and CDZ.TO in my portfolio?

ESGC.TO and CDZ.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESGC.TO or CDZ.TO?

On fees, ESGC.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESGC.TO or CDZ.TO?

ESGC.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for CDZ.TO.

What is the main difference between ESGC.TO and CDZ.TO?

ESGC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index, while CDZ.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESGC.TO and 0.66% for CDZ.TO.