ESGB vs. VXUS
ESGB (IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by IndexIQ, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. ESGB is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESGB returned 5.42%/yr vs 19.30%/yr for VXUS. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESGB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
ESGB vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGB achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.25% return.
ESGB
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 5.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
ESGB vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.50% | 7.76% | 4.19% | 7.16% | -14.44% | 0.38% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.25% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | -1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGB and VXUS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.28 |
The correlation between ESGB and VXUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESGB vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGB
VXUS
Financial Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
ESGB
VXUS
Healthcare
ESGB
VXUS
Basic Materials
ESGB
-
VXUS
Communication Services
ESGB
-
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
ESGB
-
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
ESGB
-
VXUS
Energy
ESGB
-
VXUS
Industrials
ESGB
-
VXUS
Real Estate
ESGB
-
VXUS
Technology
ESGB
-
VXUS
Utilities
ESGB
-
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGB vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
ESGB
VXUS
ESGB vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGB | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | 2.12 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 2.90 | -0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.85 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.28 | 11.14 | -4.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGB | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 2.12 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.39 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
ESGB vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGB drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGB and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGB | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -35.97% | +17.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -11.27% | +8.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.90% | -13.58% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.99% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.08% | -8.22% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 2.88% | -2.03% |
Volatility
ESGB vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB) is 1.28%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that ESGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGB | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 5.60% | -4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | 13.00% | -10.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.74% | 15.21% | -11.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 16.05% | -11.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 17.16% | -12.12% |
ESGB vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGB vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
ESGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than VXUS's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | 5.50% | 5.46% | 5.40% | 4.82% | 3.17% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.66% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGB and VXUS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to ESGB (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGB dropped -18.96% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 3-year performance, VXUS leads with 19.30% vs 5.42% for ESGB. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, ESGB has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 19.30% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ESGB.
ESGB has the higher dividend yield at 5.50%, compared with 2.66% for VXUS.
ESGB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while VXUS is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESGB and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGB and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer