PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGB vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGB vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGB achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return.


ESGB

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.49%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
5.42%
5Y*
10Y*

VTV

1D
0.01%
1M
4.23%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGB vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESGB
IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF
0.50%7.76%4.19%7.16%-14.44%0.38%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%8.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGB and VTV is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.20

The correlation between ESGB and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESGB vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGB
VTV

Financial Services

0.2%
22.3%

Healthcare

0.0%
14.5%

Basic Materials

-

3.1%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.4%

Energy

-

8.1%

Industrials

-

14.0%

Real Estate

-

2.8%

Technology

-

13.4%

Utilities

-

5.2%

Financial Services

ESGB
0.2%
VTV
22.3%

Healthcare

ESGB
0.0%
VTV
14.5%

Basic Materials

ESGB

-

VTV
3.1%

Communication Services

ESGB

-

VTV
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGB

-

VTV
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

ESGB

-

VTV
9.4%

Energy

ESGB

-

VTV
8.1%

Industrials

ESGB

-

VTV
14.0%

Real Estate

ESGB

-

VTV
2.8%

Technology

ESGB

-

VTV
13.4%

Utilities

ESGB

-

VTV
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGB vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGB
ESGB Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ESGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGB Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGB vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGBVTVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

2.61

-1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

3.74

-1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

4.15

-2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.28

15.69

-9.41

ESGB vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGB Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGB and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGBVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.61

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.51

-0.36

Drawdowns

ESGB vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGB drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGB and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGBVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-59.27%

+40.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.60%

-6.35%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.90%

-14.52%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

0.00%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-7.87%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

1.68%

-0.83%

Volatility

ESGB vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB) is 1.28%, while Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a volatility of 2.52%. This indicates that ESGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGBVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

2.52%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

7.55%

-4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74%

10.11%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.04%

13.88%

-8.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

16.67%

-11.63%

ESGB vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGB vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

ESGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGB
IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF
5.50%5.46%5.40%4.82%3.17%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGB and VTV have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTV has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to ESGB (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGB dropped -18.96% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 3-year performance, VTV leads with 18.28% vs 5.42% for ESGB. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ESGB has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VTV has performed better with a 18.28% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ESGB.

ESGB has the higher dividend yield at 5.50%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.

ESGB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESGB and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGB and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer