ESGB vs. MAMB

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ESGB (IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF) and MAMB (Monarch Ambassador Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. ESGB is actively managed, while MAMB is passively managed. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ESGB charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for MAMB.

Performance

ESGB vs. MAMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB) and Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ESGB

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

MAMB

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -1.94%
• 6M: -1.83%
• YTD: -0.37%
• 1Y: 4.18%
• 3Y*: 5.01%
• 5Y*: 0.16%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF	$478.75K	$740.46K	$535.13K

ESGB vs. MAMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF	-0.18%
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF	-2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGB and MAMB is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026	0.06

Return for Risk

ESGB vs. MAMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESGB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MAMB

MAMB Risk / Return Rank: 34
MAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
MAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 33
MAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESGB vs. MAMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB) and Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESGB	MAMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.89	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.25	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.16	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.29	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.13	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGB	MAMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-19.33%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.94%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-3.94%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.35%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ESGB	MAMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.70%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	7.05%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	6.87%	—

ESGB vs. MAMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MAMB's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESGB vs. MAMB - Dividend Comparison

ESGB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF	2.71%	2.47%	2.11%	1.73%	0.92%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESGB and MAMB in my portfolio?

ESGB and MAMB have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESGB or MAMB?

On fees, ESGB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESGB or MAMB?

ESGB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for MAMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESGB or MAMB?

MAMB has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.00% for ESGB.

What is the main difference between ESGB and MAMB?

They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Monarch. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESGB and 1.49% for MAMB.