ESGB vs. KBWY
ESGB (IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF) and KBWY (Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by IndexIQ, while KBWY is a REIT fund tracking the KBW Nasdaq Premium Yield Equity REIT Index. ESGB is actively managed, while KBWY is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. ESGB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBWY.
Performance
ESGB vs. KBWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ESGB
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBWY
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 23.12%
- 6M
- 23.78%
- 1Y
- 26.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.15%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.51%
ESGB vs. KBWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | -0.18% |
KBWY Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF | 5.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGB and KBWY is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGB vs. KBWY — Risk / Return Rank
ESGB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KBWY
ESGB vs. KBWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB) and Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF (KBWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGB | KBWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGB vs. KBWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGB drawdown since its inception was -0.64%, smaller than the maximum KBWY drawdown of -57.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGB and KBWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGB | KBWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -57.68% | +57.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -6.21% | +5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -14.15% | +13.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.88% | — |
Volatility
ESGB vs. KBWY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGB | KBWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.10% | 16.76% | -12.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.10% | 21.61% | -17.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.10% | 27.07% | -22.97% |
ESGB vs. KBWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWY's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGB vs. KBWY - Dividend Comparison
ESGB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KBWY Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF | 8.24% | 9.79% | 8.74% | 7.90% | 7.41% | 5.05% | 10.35% | 6.19% | 8.64% | 7.25% | 6.55% | 5.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGB and KBWY have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KBWY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KBWY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ESGB.
KBWY has the higher dividend yield at 8.24%, compared with 0.00% for ESGB.
ESGB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while KBWY is REIT. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESGB and 0.35% for KBWY.
Find the right allocation for ESGB and KBWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer