ESEM.L vs. JRDM.L
ESEM.L (Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and JRDM.L (JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - ESEM.L tracks the MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Universal Select Business Screens Index while JRDM.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ESEM.L returned 52.29% vs 58.51% for JRDM.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESEM.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JRDM.L.
Performance
ESEM.L vs. JRDM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESEM.L is traded in USD, while JRDM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRDM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESEM.L having a 27.82% return and JRDM.L slightly higher at 28.82%.
ESEM.L
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 7.41%
- YTD
- 27.82%
- 6M
- 30.89%
- 1Y
- 52.29%
- 3Y*
- 23.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JRDM.L
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 5.78%
- YTD
- 28.82%
- 6M
- 32.34%
- 1Y
- 58.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESEM.L vs. JRDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ESEM.L Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 27.82% | 33.08% | 5.76% | -0.04% |
JRDM.L JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) | 28.83% | 35.06% | 15.28% | -7.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESEM.L and JRDM.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, ESEM.L and JRDM.L have become more correlated (0.86) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ESEM.L vs. JRDM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESEM.L
JRDM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ESEM.L
JRDM.L
Financial Services
ESEM.L
JRDM.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESEM.L
JRDM.L
Communication Services
ESEM.L
JRDM.L
Basic Materials
ESEM.L
JRDM.L
Industrials
ESEM.L
JRDM.L
Healthcare
ESEM.L
JRDM.L
Energy
ESEM.L
JRDM.L
Consumer Defensive
ESEM.L
JRDM.L
Utilities
ESEM.L
JRDM.L
Real Estate
ESEM.L
JRDM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESEM.L vs. JRDM.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESEM.L
JRDM.L
ESEM.L vs. JRDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESEM.L) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESEM.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.58 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 5.11 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.05 | 18.41 | -3.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESEM.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 3.33 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 2.05 | -1.62 |
Drawdowns
ESEM.L vs. JRDM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESEM.L drawdown since its inception was -35.55%, which is greater than JRDM.L's maximum drawdown of -16.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEM.L and JRDM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESEM.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.55% | -16.06% | -19.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -12.79% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -2.66% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.38% | -2.93% | -11.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 3.41% | +0.05% |
Volatility
ESEM.L vs. JRDM.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESEM.L) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L) at 8.41%. This indicates that ESEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESEM.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.02% | 8.41% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.42% | 16.19% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.87% | 19.65% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 23.26% | -4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 23.26% | -4.12% |
ESEM.L vs. JRDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESEM.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than JRDM.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESEM.L vs. JRDM.L - Dividend Comparison
ESEM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ESEM.L Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JRDM.L JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) | 1.48% | 1.94% | 2.24% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESEM.L and JRDM.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESEM.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESEM.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JRDM.L.
ESEM.L tracks MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Universal Select Business Screens Index, while JRDM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESEM.L and 0.30% for JRDM.L.
Find the right allocation for ESEM.L and JRDM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer