PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESEE.DE vs. ZA30.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESEE.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (ESEE.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ESEE.DE having a 11.27% return and ZA30.DE slightly lower at 11.16%.


ESEE.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.21%
YTD
11.27%
6M
11.25%
1Y
25.34%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
15.09%

ZA30.DE

1D
0.60%
1M
5.42%
YTD
11.16%
6M
11.63%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESEE.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ESEE.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
11.27%4.37%32.16%22.65%-6.40%
ZA30.DE
iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.16%5.34%31.19%24.10%-5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ESEE.DE and ZA30.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2022

0.98

The correlation between ESEE.DE and ZA30.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESEE.DE vs. ZA30.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESEE.DE
ESEE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ESEE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESEE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESEE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ESEE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESEE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ZA30.DE
ZA30.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESEE.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (ESEE.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESEE.DEZA30.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

4.12

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

15.63

-3.16

ESEE.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESEE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESEE.DE and ZA30.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESEE.DEZA30.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.47

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

1.18

-0.23

Drawdowns

ESEE.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESEE.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, which is greater than ZA30.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESEE.DE and ZA30.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESEE.DEZA30.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.58%

-23.45%

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-6.91%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

-23.45%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-3.22%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.83%

+0.20%

Volatility

ESEE.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (ESEE.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) have volatilities of 2.65% and 2.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESEE.DEZA30.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

2.73%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

7.54%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

11.54%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

14.38%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

14.38%

+1.71%

ESEE.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESEE.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ZA30.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESEE.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESEE.DE nor ZA30.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, ESEE.DE and ZA30.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZA30.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZA30.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ESEE.DE.

ESEE.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while ZA30.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESEE.DE and 0.07% for ZA30.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESEE.DE and ZA30.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer