PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESE.PA vs. SP5.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESE.PA vs. SP5.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESE.PA) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (SP5.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESE.PA having a 11.48% return and SP5.PA slightly higher at 11.61%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ESE.PA having a 15.10% annualized return and SP5.PA not far ahead at 15.18%.


ESE.PA

1D
-0.10%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.48%
6M
11.30%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
15.10%

SP5.PA

1D
-0.13%
1M
5.23%
YTD
11.61%
6M
11.49%
1Y
25.83%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
15.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESE.PA vs. SP5.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESE.PA
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.48%3.58%33.68%22.35%-14.10%40.40%8.06%33.39%-0.04%7.07%
SP5.PA
Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
11.61%4.06%34.08%22.28%-13.91%40.50%7.97%33.38%-0.25%7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ESE.PA and SP5.PA is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2010

0.93

The correlation between ESE.PA and SP5.PA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESE.PA vs. SP5.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESE.PA
ESE.PA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ESE.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESE.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESE.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ESE.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESE.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SP5.PA
SP5.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SP5.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SP5.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SP5.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SP5.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SP5.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESE.PA vs. SP5.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESE.PA) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (SP5.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESE.PASP5.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.60

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.50

12.87

-0.37

ESE.PA vs. SP5.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESE.PA Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the SP5.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESE.PA and SP5.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESE.PASP5.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.23

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.97

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.93

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.92

-0.11

Drawdowns

ESE.PA vs. SP5.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESE.PA drawdown since its inception was -36.74%, which is greater than SP5.PA's maximum drawdown of -33.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESE.PA and SP5.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESE.PASP5.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.74%

-33.67%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-7.08%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.28%

-23.28%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.28%

-23.28%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.62%

-33.67%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.44%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-4.12%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.99%

+0.03%

Volatility

ESE.PA vs. SP5.PA - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESE.PA) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (SP5.PA) have volatilities of 2.64% and 2.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESE.PASP5.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

2.64%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

7.52%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.37%

11.42%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

15.18%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

16.07%

+0.02%

ESE.PA vs. SP5.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESE.PA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SP5.PA's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESE.PA vs. SP5.PA - Dividend Comparison

ESE.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SP5.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESE.PA
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SP5.PA
Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
0.89%1.00%1.20%1.05%2.12%1.09%1.55%1.64%1.93%1.76%1.89%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, ESE.PA and SP5.PA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SP5.PA is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SP5.PA is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ESE.PA.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESE.PA and 0.05% for SP5.PA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESE.PA and SP5.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer