ESE.PA vs. BNQP.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ESE.PA (BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and BNQP.DE (BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - ESE.PA is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while BNQP.DE is a Metals fund tracking the RICI Enhanced Copper. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESE.PA returned 14.69%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for BNQP.DE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESE.PA charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNQP.DE.

Performance

ESE.PA vs. BNQP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESE.PA) and BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC (BNQP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESE.PA achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly lower than BNQP.DE's 12.82% return.

ESE.PA

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 11.48%
• 6M: 11.30%
• 1Y: 25.41%
• 3Y*: 18.70%
• 5Y*: 14.69%
• 10Y*: 15.10%

BNQP.DE

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 6.09%
• YTD: 12.82%
• 6M: 23.25%
• 1Y: 42.24%
• 3Y*: 17.47%
• 5Y*: 9.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESE.PA vs. BNQP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ESE.PA BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF	11.48%	3.58%	33.68%	22.35%	-14.10%	40.40%	8.06%	33.39%	-0.04%	7.07%
BNQP.DE BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC	12.82%	20.92%	16.44%	2.18%	-3.18%	31.64%	12.34%	7.41%	-13.56%	16.95%

Correlation

The correlation between ESE.PA and BNQP.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016	0.27

Return for Risk

ESE.PA vs. BNQP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESE.PA

ESE.PA Risk / Return Rank: 69
ESE.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ESE.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ESE.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ESE.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ESE.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 69

BNQP.DE

BNQP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 75
BNQP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BNQP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BNQP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BNQP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BNQP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESE.PA vs. BNQP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESE.PA) and BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC (BNQP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESE.PA	BNQP.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.21	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	3.09	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.40	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	4.87	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.50	16.92	-4.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESE.PA vs. BNQP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESE.PA Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the BNQP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESE.PA and BNQP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESE.PA	BNQP.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.21	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96	0.52	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.66	+0.15

Drawdowns

ESE.PA vs. BNQP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESE.PA drawdown since its inception was -36.74%, which is greater than BNQP.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESE.PA and BNQP.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESE.PA	BNQP.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.74%	-29.03%	-7.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.15%	-8.63%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.28%	-17.93%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.28%	-25.14%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-1.26%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.88%	-9.15%	+4.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	2.49%	-0.47%

Volatility

ESE.PA vs. BNQP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESE.PA) is 2.64%, while BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC (BNQP.DE) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that ESE.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNQP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESE.PA	BNQP.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.64%	5.70%	-3.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.47%	15.31%	-7.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.37%	19.07%	-7.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.12%	19.11%	-3.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.09%	18.78%	-2.69%

ESE.PA vs. BNQP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESE.PA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BNQP.DE's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESE.PA vs. BNQP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESE.PA nor BNQP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESE.PA and BNQP.DE in my portfolio?

ESE.PA and BNQP.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESE.PA or BNQP.DE?

On fees, ESE.PA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESE.PA or BNQP.DE?

ESE.PA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNQP.DE.

What is the main difference between ESE.PA and BNQP.DE?

ESE.PA is categorized as S&P 500, while BNQP.DE is Metals. ESE.PA tracks S&P 500 Index, while BNQP.DE tracks RICI Enhanced Copper. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESE.PA and 1.00% for BNQP.DE.