PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESAD.DE vs. LEEU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESAD.DE vs. LEEU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE) and Amundi FTSE EPRA Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist (LEEU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESAD.DE achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly higher than LEEU.DE's -1.07% return.


ESAD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
7.67%
6M
6.84%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
10Y*

LEEU.DE

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
-0.23%
1Y
-2.88%
3Y*
6.48%
5Y*
-4.92%
10Y*
-0.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESAD.DE vs. LEEU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ESAD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation
7.67%-3.81%3.54%7.64%-19.66%
LEEU.DE
Amundi FTSE EPRA Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist
-1.07%6.43%-4.44%16.06%-35.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ESAD.DE and LEEU.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022

0.67

The correlation between ESAD.DE and LEEU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESAD.DE vs. LEEU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESAD.DE
ESAD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ESAD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

LEEU.DE
LEEU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
LEEU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEEU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEEU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
LEEU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEEU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESAD.DE vs. LEEU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE) and Amundi FTSE EPRA Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist (LEEU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESAD.DELEEU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.98

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

-0.18

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.70

-0.46

+3.16

ESAD.DE vs. LEEU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESAD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the LEEU.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESAD.DE and LEEU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESAD.DELEEU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

-0.18

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.19

-0.31

Drawdowns

ESAD.DE vs. LEEU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESAD.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.37%, smaller than the maximum LEEU.DE drawdown of -48.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESAD.DE and LEEU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESAD.DELEEU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.37%

-48.13%

+17.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-15.66%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.22%

-21.66%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.52%

-29.86%

+18.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.56%

-14.36%

-3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

6.27%

-3.52%

Volatility

ESAD.DE vs. LEEU.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE) is 2.98%, while Amundi FTSE EPRA Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist (LEEU.DE) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that ESAD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEEU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESAD.DELEEU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

4.58%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

13.17%

-4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.74%

16.03%

-4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.78%

21.81%

-7.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.78%

20.09%

-5.31%

ESAD.DE vs. LEEU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESAD.DE has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than LEEU.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESAD.DE vs. LEEU.DE - Dividend Comparison

ESAD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LEEU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESAD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LEEU.DE
Amundi FTSE EPRA Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist
2.77%2.74%4.56%4.24%3.83%2.42%2.75%3.13%4.02%3.18%3.62%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESAD.DE and LEEU.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LEEU.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LEEU.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for ESAD.DE.

ESAD.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB, while LEEU.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for ESAD.DE and 0.30% for LEEU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESAD.DE and LEEU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer