ERX vs. BSMW
ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) and BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ERX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index (300%), while BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ERX returned 23.69%/yr vs 3.20%/yr for BSMW. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. ERX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMW.
Performance
ERX vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERX achieves a 66.93% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.30% return.
ERX
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 66.93%
- 6M
- 59.74%
- 1Y
- 90.37%
- 3Y*
- 23.69%
- 5Y*
- 28.75%
- 10Y*
- -8.79%
BSMW
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERX vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 66.93% | 2.79% | 1.09% | -5.89% |
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.30% | 3.42% | -0.35% | 7.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERX and BSMW is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023 | -0.13 |
The correlation between ERX and BSMW shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to -0.11 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ERX vs. BSMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ERX
BSMW
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
ERX
BSMW
-
Basic Materials
ERX
-
BSMW
-
Communication Services
ERX
-
BSMW
-
Consumer Cyclical
ERX
-
BSMW
Consumer Defensive
ERX
-
BSMW
-
Financial Services
ERX
-
BSMW
Healthcare
ERX
-
BSMW
-
Industrials
ERX
-
BSMW
-
Real Estate
ERX
-
BSMW
-
Technology
ERX
-
BSMW
Utilities
ERX
-
BSMW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERX vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank
ERX
BSMW
ERX vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERX | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.50 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 2.39 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 7.53 | +3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERX | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 2.48 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.69 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
ERX vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERX drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERX and BSMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERX | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.54% | -7.57% | -91.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.34% | -2.92% | -20.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.34% | -7.34% | -35.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.57% | -0.98% | -90.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.02% | -1.72% | -65.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.57% | 0.92% | +7.65% |
Volatility
ERX vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a higher volatility of 16.49% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.93%. This indicates that ERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERX | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.49% | 0.93% | +15.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.45% | 1.98% | +31.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.14% | 2.82% | +38.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.98% | 5.00% | +46.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.18% | 5.00% | +64.18% |
ERX vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
ERX vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison
ERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than BSMW's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.48% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.61% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERX and BSMW have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ERX has higher volatility (16.49%) compared to BSMW (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERX dropped -99.54% vs BSMW's -7.57%.
On 3-year performance, ERX leads with 23.69% vs 3.20% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ERX has performed better with a 23.69% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.
BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 1.61% for ERX.
ERX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%), while BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for ERX and 0.18% for BSMW.
BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ERX and BSMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer