ERO vs. NVDA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ERO (Ero Copper Corp) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. ERO operates in Copper (Basic Materials), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, ERO returned 4.57%/yr vs 63.13%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ERO vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ero Copper Corp (ERO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERO achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.16% return.

ERO

• 1D: 6.10%
• 1M: -5.13%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 16.30%
• 1Y: 87.56%
• 3Y*: 14.46%
• 5Y*: 4.57%
• 10Y*: —

NVDA

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -9.03%
• YTD: 10.16%
• 6M: 17.38%
• 1Y: 41.70%
• 3Y*: 71.13%
• 5Y*: 63.13%
• 10Y*: 67.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERO vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ERO Ero Copper Corp	3.89%	109.87%	-14.63%	14.84%	-10.07%	-5.73%	-10.97%	151.68%	21.41%	52.76%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	10.16%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	-1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ERO and NVDA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017	0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap ERO : $3.09B NVDA : $5.00T
EPS ERO : $2.80 NVDA : $6.53
PE Ratio ERO : 10.51 NVDA : 31.44
PEG Ratio ERO : 0.11 NVDA : 0.17
PS Ratio ERO : 3.32 NVDA : 19.80
PB Ratio ERO : 2.80 NVDA : 25.60
Total Revenue (TTM) ERO : $925.20M NVDA : $253.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) ERO : $394.67M NVDA : $187.95B
EBITDA (TTM) ERO : $528.87M NVDA : $192.76B

Return for Risk

ERO vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERO

ERO Risk / Return Rank: 78
ERO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ERO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ERO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ERO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ERO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 75
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERO vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ero Copper Corp (ERO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ERO	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.20	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	1.75	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.21	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	2.07	+0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.95	4.94	+0.01

ERO vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERO Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERO and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ERO vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERO drawdown since its inception was -67.17%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERO and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ERO	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.17%	-89.72%	+22.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.97%	-20.21%	-17.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.84%	-36.88%	-22.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.89%	-66.34%	+2.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.72%	-12.86%	-9.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.04%	-36.18%	+9.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.75%	8.46%	+9.29%

Volatility

ERO vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Ero Copper Corp (ERO) has a higher volatility of 26.23% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 13.26%. This indicates that ERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ERO	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.23%	13.26%	+12.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.36%	26.67%	+20.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.06%	35.00%	+23.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.03%	51.76%	+3.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.38%	49.84%	+9.54%

Dividends

ERO vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ERO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ERO Ero Copper Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Financials

ERO vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ero Copper Corp and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ERO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ero Copper Corp reported a gross profit of 103.33M and revenue of 259.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

ERO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ero Copper Corp reported an operating income of 90.17M and revenue of 259.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.7%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

ERO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ero Copper Corp reported a net income of 107.26M and revenue of 259.52M, resulting in a net margin of 41.3%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ERO and NVDA in my portfolio?

ERO and NVDA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ERO or NVDA?

ERO has higher volatility (26.23%) compared to NVDA (13.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERO dropped -67.17% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ERO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.