ERO.L vs. LDEG.L
ERO.L (SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF) and LDEG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - ERO.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while LDEG.L tracks the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ERO.L returned 10.01%/yr vs 16.11%/yr for LDEG.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
ERO.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ERO.L is traded in GBP, while LDEG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LDEG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERO.L achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than LDEG.L's 10.41% return.
ERO.L
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 6.83%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 19.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
LDEG.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- 30.52%
- 3Y*
- 23.92%
- 5Y*
- 16.11%
- 10Y*
- —
ERO.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERO.L SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF | 6.83% | 25.68% | 3.93% | 13.00% | -3.77% | 7.43% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 10.41% | 44.92% | 8.83% | 14.32% | 3.42% | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERO.L and LDEG.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between ERO.L and LDEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.88 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ERO.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ERO.L
LDEG.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
ERO.L
LDEG.L
Industrials
ERO.L
LDEG.L
Healthcare
ERO.L
LDEG.L
Technology
ERO.L
LDEG.L
Consumer Defensive
ERO.L
LDEG.L
Consumer Cyclical
ERO.L
LDEG.L
Basic Materials
ERO.L
LDEG.L
Energy
ERO.L
LDEG.L
Utilities
ERO.L
LDEG.L
Communication Services
ERO.L
LDEG.L
Real Estate
ERO.L
LDEG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERO.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ERO.L
LDEG.L
ERO.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (ERO.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERO.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.48 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 3.78 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | 13.82 | -7.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERO.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.63 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 1.24 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.24 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
ERO.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERO.L drawdown since its inception was -28.41%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERO.L and LDEG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERO.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.41% | -15.97% | -12.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -8.04% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.84% | -12.05% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.76% | -15.97% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -1.33% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -2.95% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.20% | +0.82% |
Volatility
ERO.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (ERO.L) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that ERO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERO.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 3.57% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.30% | 9.21% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.35% | 11.55% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 15.99% | -2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 16.01% | -1.10% |
ERO.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ERO.L and LDEG.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ERO.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison
ERO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERO.L SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 3.43% | 4.21% | 4.11% | 3.70% | 3.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERO.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ERO.L and LDEG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
ERO.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Legal & General.
Find the right allocation for ERO.L and LDEG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer