PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERO.L vs. JRDZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERO.L vs. JRDZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (ERO.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ERO.L is traded in GBP, while JRDZ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRDZ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERO.L achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than JRDZ.L's 8.20% return.


ERO.L

1D
0.59%
1M
3.70%
YTD
6.83%
6M
8.78%
1Y
19.36%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
10.13%

JRDZ.L

1D
0.42%
1M
4.70%
YTD
8.20%
6M
10.44%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERO.L vs. JRDZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ERO.L and JRDZ.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024

0.30

The correlation between ERO.L and JRDZ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERO.L vs. JRDZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERO.L
ERO.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ERO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ERO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

JRDZ.L
JRDZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
JRDZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRDZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRDZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
JRDZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRDZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERO.L vs. JRDZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (ERO.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERO.LJRDZ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

2.16

-0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

32.94

-31.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.40

83.74

-77.34

ERO.L vs. JRDZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the JRDZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERO.L and JRDZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERO.LJRDZ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

6.59

-5.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

7.14

-6.54

Drawdowns

ERO.L vs. JRDZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERO.L drawdown since its inception was -28.41%, which is greater than JRDZ.L's maximum drawdown of -4.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERO.L and JRDZ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERO.LJRDZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.41%

-4.00%

-24.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-4.00%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-0.05%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-1.05%

-3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

Volatility

ERO.L vs. JRDZ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (ERO.L) is 3.96%, while JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that ERO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRDZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERO.LJRDZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

4.56%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

20.18%

-7.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.81%

23.37%

-9.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

23.37%

-8.46%

ERO.L vs. JRDZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ERO.L and JRDZ.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ERO.L vs. JRDZ.L - Dividend Comparison

ERO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRDZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ERO.L and JRDZ.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERO.L and JRDZ.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

ERO.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while JRDZ.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERO.L and JRDZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer