PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERO.L vs. FRXD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERO.L vs. FRXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (ERO.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (FRXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ERO.L is traded in GBP, while FRXD.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FRXD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERO.L achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than FRXD.L's 10.07% return.


ERO.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.37%
6M
4.82%
YTD
7.98%
1Y
18.23%
3Y*
14.22%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*
9.64%

FRXD.L

1D
0.92%
1M
-1.48%
6M
9.59%
YTD
10.07%
1Y
18.37%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERO.L vs. FRXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERO.L
SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
7.98%25.68%3.93%13.00%-3.77%16.91%2.21%19.36%-9.30%0.79%
FRXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
10.07%30.65%7.63%8.12%5.16%10.32%1.12%17.41%-8.42%-3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ERO.L and FRXD.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2017

0.74

The correlation between ERO.L and FRXD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERO.L vs. FRXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERO.L
ERO.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ERO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ERO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FRXD.L
FRXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FRXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERO.L vs. FRXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (ERO.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (FRXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERO.LFRXD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

5.09

-3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

11.52

-5.56

ERO.L vs. FRXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the FRXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERO.L and FRXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERO.L vs. FRXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERO.L drawdown since its inception was -28.41%, roughly equal to the maximum FRXD.L drawdown of -29.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERO.L and FRXD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERO.LFRXD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.41%

-29.39%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-3.59%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-8.29%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.76%

-12.18%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-2.43%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-3.52%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

1.59%

+1.46%

Volatility

ERO.L vs. FRXD.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (ERO.L) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (FRXD.L) at 2.73%. This indicates that ERO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERO.LFRXD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

2.73%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.76%

7.14%

+3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

8.95%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

11.34%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

13.38%

+1.42%

ERO.L vs. FRXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ERO.L and FRXD.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ERO.L vs. FRXD.L - Dividend Comparison

ERO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ERO.L
SPDR MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.91%4.28%4.30%5.00%5.20%4.63%3.53%4.42%5.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERO.L and FRXD.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERO.L and FRXD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

ERO.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FRXD.L tracks LibertyQ European Dividend Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERO.L and FRXD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer