ERNS.L vs. IITU.L
ERNS.L (iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ERNS.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. ERNS.L is actively managed, while IITU.L is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ERNS.L returned 2.20%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ERNS.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
ERNS.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ERNS.L is traded in GBP, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERNS.L achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ERNS.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 2.20%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
ERNS.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.62%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
ERNS.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERNS.L iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 1.58% | 4.84% | 5.54% | 4.76% | 1.54% | 0.13% | 0.77% | 1.27% | 0.58% | 0.57% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERNS.L and IITU.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERNS.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
ERNS.L
IITU.L
ERNS.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERNS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.39 | 1.44 | +0.95 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 20.38 | 3.17 | +17.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 108.76 | 8.17 | +100.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERNS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.30 | 2.71 | +2.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 4.34 | 1.16 | +3.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.38 | 1.28 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.23 | 1.23 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
ERNS.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERNS.L drawdown since its inception was -1.51%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNS.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERNS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -28.03% | +26.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.22% | -16.76% | +16.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.22% | -28.03% | +27.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.36% | -28.03% | +27.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -1.51% | -28.03% | +26.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.89% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -5.14% | +5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 6.51% | -6.47% |
Volatility
ERNS.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) is 0.36%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that ERNS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERNS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | 7.01% | -6.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.68% | 14.45% | -13.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 19.60% | -18.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.83% | 21.94% | -21.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.92% | 21.31% | -20.39% |
ERNS.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERNS.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ERNS.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
ERNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERNS.L iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 5.65% | 4.65% | 5.42% | 4.54% | 1.14% | 0.28% | 0.75% | 1.04% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.81% | 0.72% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERNS.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ERNS.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ERNS.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IITU.L.
ERNS.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERNS.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for ERNS.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer