PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERNS.L vs. ESIE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERNS.L vs. ESIE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERNS.L achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly lower than ESIE.L's 27.16% return.


ERNS.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.99%
YTD
1.98%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
2.22%

ESIE.L

1D
-1.17%
1M
0.32%
6M
24.04%
YTD
27.16%
1Y
38.75%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
19.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERNS.L vs. ESIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
1.98%4.84%5.55%4.76%1.53%0.14%-0.03%
ESIE.L
iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
27.16%20.19%-9.72%6.00%44.93%26.73%-6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ERNS.L and ESIE.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

-0.02

The correlation between ERNS.L and ESIE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERNS.L vs. ESIE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERNS.L
ERNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIE.L
ESIE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ESIE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERNS.L vs. ESIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERNS.LESIE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.40

1.30

+1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

19.43

2.08

+17.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

108.42

6.31

+102.11

ERNS.L vs. ESIE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.34, which is higher than the ESIE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERNS.L and ESIE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERNS.L vs. ESIE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERNS.L drawdown since its inception was -1.51%, smaller than the maximum ESIE.L drawdown of -27.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNS.L and ESIE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERNS.LESIE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-27.35%

+25.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.22%

-18.55%

+18.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.22%

-27.35%

+27.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.36%

-27.35%

+26.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-11.85%

+11.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-8.34%

+8.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

6.12%

-6.08%

Volatility

ERNS.L vs. ESIE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) is 0.19%, while iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that ERNS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERNS.LESIE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

7.06%

-6.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.65%

20.29%

-19.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79%

23.26%

-22.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.82%

24.48%

-23.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.92%

24.82%

-23.90%

ERNS.L vs. ESIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERNS.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIE.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ERNS.L vs. ESIE.L - Dividend Comparison

ERNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, while ESIE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNS.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
4.28%4.65%5.42%4.54%1.14%0.28%0.75%1.04%0.74%0.52%0.81%0.72%
ESIE.L
iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERNS.L and ESIE.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNS.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNS.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIE.L.

ERNS.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while ESIE.L is Energy Equities. ERNS.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index, while ESIE.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERNS.L and 0.18% for ESIE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERNS.L and ESIE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer