PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERET vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERET vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERET achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.48% return.


ERET

1D
-0.64%
1M
1.56%
6M
8.15%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
17.72%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.00%

DBO

1D
1.56%
1M
24.59%
6M
53.46%
YTD
76.48%
1Y
60.30%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
12.59%
ALL TIME*
0.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.01M$10.23M$13.95M
$79.29K$48.12K$74.20K

ERET vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ERET
Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
12.18%10.26%0.60%10.25%0.29%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
76.48%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%-7.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ERET and DBO is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022

-0.03

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between ERET and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.24, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERET vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ERET
ERET Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ERET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERET Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ERET Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERET Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ERET vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERETDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

2.01

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.40

6.09

+0.31

ERET vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERET Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERET and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERET vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERET drawdown since its inception was -20.30%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERET and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERETDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.30%

-90.18%

+69.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-27.73%

+17.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.61%

-28.20%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-53.56%

+52.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-62.20%

+56.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

9.96%

-7.17%

Volatility

ERET vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) is 3.53%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that ERET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERETDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

17.75%

-14.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

33.77%

-23.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

38.53%

-26.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

33.35%

-17.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.66%

32.20%

-16.54%

ERET vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERET has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERET vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

ERET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than DBO's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.99%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
ERET
Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
3.24%3.79%4.26%3.67%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERET and DBO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to ERET (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERET dropped -20.30% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 14.86% vs 9.46% for ERET. On fees, ERET is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ERET has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ERET is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

ERET has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 1.99% for DBO.

ERET is categorized as REIT, while DBO is Oil & Gas. ERET tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Target Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ERET and 0.78% for DBO.

ERET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERET and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer