ERASX vs. ETIDX
ERASX (Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A) and ETIDX (Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ERASX returned 4.24%/yr vs 8.89%/yr for ETIDX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ERASX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ETIDX.
Performance
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERASX achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than ETIDX's 18.14% return.
ERASX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- 6M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- -5.20%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
ETIDX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- YTD
- 18.14%
- 1Y
- 19.19%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- —
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERASX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A | 0.78% | -5.59% | 17.74% | 14.08% | -8.72% | 22.10% | 11.40% | 44.21% | -5.47% | 7.50% |
ETIDX Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund | 18.14% | 5.67% | 16.56% | 19.67% | -21.77% | 31.98% | 25.38% | 27.07% | -10.37% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERASX and ETIDX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2017 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ERASX and ETIDX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERASX vs. ETIDX — Risk / Return Rank
ERASX
ETIDX
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A (ERASX) and Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ERASX | ETIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.22 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 2.50 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 7.85 | -8.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERASX drawdown since its inception was -39.94%, which is greater than ETIDX's maximum drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERASX and ETIDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERASX | ETIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.94% | -34.12% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -7.60% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.36% | -20.51% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.77% | -29.11% | +9.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.34% | -2.90% | -7.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -7.03% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.99% | 2.42% | +5.57% |
Volatility
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A (ERASX) is 4.99%, while Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETIDX) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that ERASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERASX | ETIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 6.17% | -1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 12.58% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 15.31% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 17.86% | -0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 18.28% | +0.61% |
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERASX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than ETIDX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Dividend Comparison
ERASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than ETIDX's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERASX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A | 6.39% | 6.44% | 7.29% | 2.82% | 10.26% | 10.40% | 9.73% | 13.15% | 7.16% | 3.29% | 3.57% | 6.68% |
ETIDX Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund | 3.00% | 3.58% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 1.98% | 2.78% | 1.05% | 1.99% | 2.16% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERASX and ETIDX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETIDX has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to ERASX (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERASX dropped -39.94% vs ETIDX's -34.12%.
ETIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ERASX and ETIDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer