ERASX vs. ETIDX
ERASX (Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A) and ETIDX (Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ERASX returned 4.21%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for ETIDX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ERASX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ETIDX.
Performance
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERASX achieves a -3.22% return, which is significantly lower than ETIDX's 19.79% return.
ERASX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -4.88%
- 1Y
- -4.42%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.43%
ETIDX
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 18.59%
- 1Y
- 24.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- —
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERASX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A | -3.22% | -5.59% | 17.74% | 14.08% | -8.72% | 22.10% | 11.40% | 44.21% | -5.47% | 7.50% |
ETIDX Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund | 19.79% | 5.67% | 16.56% | 19.67% | -21.77% | 31.98% | 25.38% | 27.07% | -10.37% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERASX and ETIDX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between ERASX and ETIDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERASX vs. ETIDX — Risk / Return Rank
ERASX
ETIDX
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A (ERASX) and Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ERASX | ETIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.29 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 3.27 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | 10.52 | -11.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERASX drawdown since its inception was -39.94%, which is greater than ETIDX's maximum drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERASX and ETIDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERASX | ETIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.94% | -34.12% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -7.60% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.36% | -20.51% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.77% | -29.11% | +9.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.89% | -0.26% | -13.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -7.06% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 2.36% | +5.39% |
Volatility
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A (ERASX) is 4.59%, while Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETIDX) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that ERASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERASX | ETIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 5.61% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 12.05% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 14.79% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 17.78% | -0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 18.27% | +0.69% |
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERASX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than ETIDX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ERASX vs. ETIDX - Dividend Comparison
ERASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than ETIDX's 2.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERASX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A | 6.65% | 6.44% | 7.29% | 2.82% | 10.26% | 10.40% | 9.73% | 13.15% | 7.16% | 3.29% | 3.57% | 6.68% |
ETIDX Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund | 2.98% | 3.58% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 1.98% | 2.78% | 1.05% | 1.99% | 2.16% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERASX and ETIDX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETIDX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to ERASX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERASX dropped -39.94% vs ETIDX's -34.12%.
ETIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ERASX and ETIDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer