ERAS vs. AU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ERAS (Erasca, Inc.) and AU (AngloGold Ashanti Limited) are both stocks. ERAS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while AU operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, ERAS returned 68.63%/yr vs 58.20%/yr for AU. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ERAS vs. AU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) and AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERAS achieves a 277.69% return, which is significantly higher than AU's 4.15% return.

ERAS

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 34.32%
• YTD: 277.69%
• 6M: 290.28%
• 1Y: 818.30%
• 3Y*: 68.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AU

• 1D: 3.75%
• 1M: -14.67%
• YTD: 4.15%
• 6M: 7.11%
• 1Y: 86.54%
• 3Y*: 58.20%
• 5Y*: 35.46%
• 10Y*: 20.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERAS vs. AU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ERAS Erasca, Inc.	277.69%	48.21%	17.84%	-50.58%	-72.34%	-2.01%
AU AngloGold Ashanti Limited	4.15%	288.18%	25.43%	-2.68%	-5.09%	4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ERAS and AU is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021	0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap ERAS : $4.28B AU : $43.57B
EPS ERAS : -$0.96 AU : $6.85
PB Ratio ERAS : 10.86 AU : 5.11
Total Revenue (TTM) ERAS : $0.00 AU : $11.17B
Gross Profit (TTM) ERAS : -$743.00K AU : $5.82B
EBITDA (TTM) ERAS : -$279.47M AU : $5.58B

Return for Risk

ERAS vs. AU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERAS

ERAS Risk / Return Rank: 98
ERAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
ERAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ERAS Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ERAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ERAS Martin Ratio Rank: 99

AU

AU Risk / Return Rank: 79
AU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
AU Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
AU Omega Ratio Rank: 77
AU Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
AU Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERAS vs. AU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) and AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ERAS	AU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.95	1.50	+6.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.41	1.95	+2.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	1.26	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.90	2.35	+11.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	43.69	6.18	+37.50

ERAS vs. AU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERAS Sharpe Ratio is 7.95, which is higher than the AU Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERAS and AU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ERAS vs. AU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERAS drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than AU's maximum drawdown of -90.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERAS and AU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ERAS	AU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.65%	-90.12%	-5.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.46%	-37.03%	-22.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.68%	-38.71%	-28.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-51.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.28%	-30.75%	-11.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.66%	-46.07%	-28.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.96%	14.04%	+4.92%

Volatility

ERAS vs. AU - Volatility Comparison

Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) and AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU) have volatilities of 20.78% and 21.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ERAS	AU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.78%	21.02%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	96.05%	46.50%	+49.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.00%	58.45%	+45.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.41%	49.13%	+34.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.41%	49.79%	+33.62%

Dividends

ERAS vs. AU - Dividend Comparison

ERAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AU AngloGold Ashanti Limited	5.33%	2.96%	1.78%	1.14%	2.26%	2.58%	0.49%	0.30%	0.48%	0.93%
ERAS Erasca, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ERAS and AU in my portfolio?

ERAS and AU have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ERAS or AU?

AU has higher volatility (21.02%) compared to ERAS (20.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERAS dropped -95.65% vs AU's -90.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ERAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.95 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.