PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQSG.L vs. QQQY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQSG.L vs. QQQY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQSG.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQSG.L is traded in GBp, while QQQY.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQY.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQSG.L achieves a 19.91% return, which is significantly higher than QQQY.L's 15.53% return.


EQSG.L

1D
-0.75%
1M
8.13%
YTD
19.91%
6M
17.66%
1Y
41.07%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
19.08%
10Y*

QQQY.L

1D
-0.85%
1M
6.80%
YTD
15.53%
6M
14.04%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQSG.L vs. QQQY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EQSG.L
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
19.91%11.73%16.29%
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP
15.53%6.11%13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EQSG.L and QQQY.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024

0.59

The correlation between EQSG.L and QQQY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQSG.L vs. QQQY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQSG.L
EQSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EQSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EQSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY.L
QQQY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQSG.L vs. QQQY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQSG.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQSG.LQQQY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

4.74

-3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.21

10.64

-8.42

EQSG.L vs. QQQY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQSG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQSG.L and QQQY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQSG.LQQQY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

2.15

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.96

-0.40

Drawdowns

EQSG.L vs. QQQY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQSG.L drawdown since its inception was -31.87%, which is greater than QQQY.L's maximum drawdown of -22.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQSG.L and QQQY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQSG.LQQQY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.87%

-22.90%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.73%

-6.93%

-23.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.55%

-0.85%

-9.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.16%

-5.03%

-8.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.86%

3.10%

+15.76%

Volatility

EQSG.L vs. QQQY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQSG.L) is 4.19%, while IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that EQSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQSG.LQQQY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

4.84%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

10.38%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.57%

15.28%

+29.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.45%

21.26%

+14.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.99%

21.26%

+13.73%

EQSG.L vs. QQQY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQSG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQSG.L vs. QQQY.L - Dividend Comparison

EQSG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.73%.


PositionTTM20252024
EQSG.L
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP
67.73%120.60%18.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQSG.L and QQQY.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQSG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQSG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQY.L.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQSG.L and 0.45% for QQQY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQSG.L and QQQY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer