PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQQX.DE vs. WF1E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQQX.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE) and Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WF1E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQQX.DE achieves a 21.61% return, which is significantly higher than WF1E.DE's 1.34% return.


EQQX.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
8.86%
YTD
21.61%
6M
19.72%
1Y
38.41%
3Y*
25.43%
5Y*
19.11%
10Y*

WF1E.DE

1D
1.98%
1M
1.45%
YTD
1.34%
6M
5.57%
1Y
10.72%
3Y*
20.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQX.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EQQX.DE
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
21.61%7.13%33.88%28.96%
WF1E.DE
Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc
1.34%13.85%32.68%14.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQX.DE and WF1E.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQQX.DE vs. WF1E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQX.DE
EQQX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

WF1E.DE
WF1E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
WF1E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WF1E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
WF1E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
WF1E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
WF1E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQX.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE) and Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WF1E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQQX.DEWF1E.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.15

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

1.19

+2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

3.65

+8.00

EQQX.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the WF1E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQX.DE and WF1E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQQX.DEWF1E.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

0.84

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

1.34

-0.44

Drawdowns

EQQX.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQX.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.17%, which is greater than WF1E.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQX.DE and WF1E.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQQX.DEWF1E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.17%

-19.97%

-11.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.97%

-8.92%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.80%

-19.97%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.87%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-2.63%

-5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

2.92%

+0.44%

Volatility

EQQX.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Invesco S&P World Financials ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WF1E.DE) at 3.46%. This indicates that EQQX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WF1E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQQX.DEWF1E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

3.46%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

9.46%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

12.69%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.86%

14.49%

+5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.79%

14.49%

+5.30%

EQQX.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQX.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than WF1E.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EQQX.DE vs. WF1E.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EQQX.DE nor WF1E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EQQX.DE and WF1E.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WF1E.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WF1E.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EQQX.DE.

EQQX.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while WF1E.DE is Financials Equities. EQQX.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while WF1E.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Financials. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQQX.DE and 0.18% for WF1E.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQQX.DE and WF1E.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer