PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EQQU.L vs. X7PP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EQQU.L vs. X7PP.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EQQU.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) and X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQQU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EQQU.L returned 22.05%/yr vs 17.54%/yr for X7PP.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EQQU.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for X7PP.L.

Performance

EQQU.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQQU.L is traded in USD, while X7PP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the X7PP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQQU.L achieves a 15.52% return, which is significantly higher than X7PP.L's 10.92% return. Over the past 10 years, EQQU.L has outperformed X7PP.L with an annualized return of 22.05%, while X7PP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 17.54% annualized return.

EQQU.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
15.52%
6M
14.82%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.78%
10Y*
22.05%

X7PP.L

1D
0.82%
1M
4.92%
YTD
10.92%
6M
11.05%
1Y
48.21%
3Y*
48.54%
5Y*
28.58%
10Y*
17.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQU.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		15.52%19.75%26.54%56.26%-33.45%27.95%48.32%38.02%-1.06%31.89%
X7PP.L
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF		10.92%101.94%24.95%29.78%-5.30%27.99%-16.01%12.68%-30.33%27.62%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQU.L and X7PP.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015

0.42

EQQU.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EQQU.L
X7PP.L

Technology

59.0%

-

Communication Services

13.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.8%

-

Healthcare

3.8%

-

Industrials

2.9%

-

Utilities

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
100.0%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

EQQU.L
59.0%
X7PP.L

-

Communication Services

EQQU.L
13.7%
X7PP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

EQQU.L
10.9%
X7PP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

EQQU.L
6.8%
X7PP.L

-

Healthcare

EQQU.L
3.8%
X7PP.L

-

Industrials

EQQU.L
2.9%
X7PP.L

-

Utilities

EQQU.L
1.2%
X7PP.L

-

Basic Materials

EQQU.L
1.1%
X7PP.L

-

Energy

EQQU.L
0.5%
X7PP.L

-

Financial Services

EQQU.L
0.2%
X7PP.L
100.0%

Real Estate

EQQU.L
0.1%
X7PP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF

Often compared with EQQU.L:
EQQU.L vs. EQQQ.LEQQU.L vs. CNDX.LEQQU.L vs. VUAA.LEQQU.L vs. SMHEQQU.L vs. QQQEQQU.L vs. CNX1.LEQQU.L vs. XLK
Often compared with X7PP.L:
X7PP.L vs. ESIF.LX7PP.L vs. S7XP.LX7PP.L vs. BNKE.LX7PP.L vs. CB5.LX7PP.L vs. HERG.LX7PP.L vs. XDNS.LX7PP.L vs. XDN0.L

Return for Risk

EQQU.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EQQU.L
EQQU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
X7PP.L
X7PP.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQU.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EQQU.LX7PP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.93
2.03

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.74
2.75

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

2.65

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.15

8.37

+1.78

EQQU.L vs. X7PP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQU.L and X7PP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQQU.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.17%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -62.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQU.L and X7PP.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EQQU.LX7PP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.17%

-62.74%

+27.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-18.12%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.30%

-19.96%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.17%

-38.99%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.17%

-62.18%

+27.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.11%

-2.13%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.04%

-22.21%

+16.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

5.75%

-2.56%

Volatility

EQQU.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) have volatilities of 6.43% and 6.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EQQU.LX7PP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

6.51%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

19.96%

-6.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.74%

23.65%

-6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

26.37%

-5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.01%

26.67%

-6.66%

EQQU.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than X7PP.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQQU.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison

EQQU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while X7PP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.26%0.39%0.55%0.65%0.64%0.82%0.74%
X7PP.L
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

EQQU.L and X7PP.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, X7PP.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X7PP.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQU.L.

EQQU.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while X7PP.L is Financials Equities. EQQU.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQQU.L and 0.20% for X7PP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQQU.L and X7PP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer