EQQU.L vs. CMOD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EQQU.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) and CMOD.L (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQQU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while CMOD.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQQU.L returned 17.59%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for CMOD.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EQQU.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for CMOD.L.

Performance

EQQU.L vs. CMOD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQQU.L achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly lower than CMOD.L's 24.60% return.

EQQU.L

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 6.80%
• YTD: 19.55%
• 6M: 18.58%
• 1Y: 39.12%
• 3Y*: 27.98%
• 5Y*: 17.59%
• 10Y*: 21.19%

CMOD.L

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -1.40%
• YTD: 24.60%
• 6M: 22.68%
• 1Y: 36.45%
• 3Y*: 15.36%
• 5Y*: 10.88%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQU.L vs. CMOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQQU.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	19.55%	19.75%	26.54%	56.27%	-33.46%	27.95%	47.76%	37.17%	-1.67%	28.87%
CMOD.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF	24.60%	16.16%	4.13%	-7.56%	14.50%	27.35%	-3.87%	6.64%	-10.22%	0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQU.L and CMOD.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2017	0.19

The correlation between EQQU.L and CMOD.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQQU.L vs. CMOD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQQU.L	CMOD.L
Technology	57.9%	5.6%
Communication Services	14.5%	12.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	12.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	9.7%
Healthcare	3.7%	-
Industrials	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	35.8%
Energy	0.5%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	17.8%
Real Estate	0.0%	5.8%

Return for Risk

EQQU.L vs. CMOD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQU.L

EQQU.L Risk / Return Rank: 75
EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
EQQU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EQQU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
EQQU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
EQQU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

CMOD.L

CMOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
CMOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
CMOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
CMOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CMOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CMOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQU.L vs. CMOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQQU.L	CMOD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	2.21	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	2.75	+0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.41	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	5.10	-1.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.04	11.82	+1.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQQU.L vs. CMOD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the CMOD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQU.L and CMOD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQQU.L	CMOD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	2.21	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	0.66	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.47	+0.48

Drawdowns

EQQU.L vs. CMOD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.17%, which is greater than CMOD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQU.L and CMOD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQQU.L	CMOD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.17%	-33.16%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.00%	-7.30%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.30%	-11.66%	-10.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.17%	-26.86%	-8.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-5.50%	+4.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.10%	-12.29%	+6.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	3.15%	-0.07%

Volatility

EQQU.L vs. CMOD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) is 4.93%, while Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that EQQU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQQU.L	CMOD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.93%	5.58%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.88%	14.96%	-3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.88%	16.80%	-0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.76%	16.57%	+4.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.97%	14.69%	+5.28%

EQQU.L vs. CMOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CMOD.L's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQQU.L vs. CMOD.L - Dividend Comparison

EQQU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while CMOD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CMOD.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EQQU.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	0.23%	0.29%	0.38%	0.39%	0.56%	0.26%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQQU.L and CMOD.L in my portfolio?

EQQU.L and CMOD.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EQQU.L or CMOD.L?

On fees, CMOD.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQQU.L or CMOD.L?

CMOD.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQU.L.

What is the main difference between EQQU.L and CMOD.L?

EQQU.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CMOD.L is Commodities. EQQU.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while CMOD.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity TR Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQQU.L and 0.19% for CMOD.L.