PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQQU.L vs. ANXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQQU.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EQQU.L having a 19.55% return and ANXU.L slightly higher at 19.66%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EQQU.L having a 21.19% annualized return and ANXU.L not far ahead at 21.70%.


EQQU.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
6.80%
YTD
19.55%
6M
18.58%
1Y
39.12%
3Y*
27.98%
5Y*
17.59%
10Y*
21.19%

ANXU.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
6.79%
YTD
19.66%
6M
18.74%
1Y
39.57%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
17.78%
10Y*
21.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQU.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
19.55%19.75%26.54%56.27%-33.46%27.95%47.76%37.17%-1.67%30.96%
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
19.66%19.86%26.74%56.50%-33.24%27.83%47.17%40.88%-1.76%32.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQU.L and ANXU.L is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2015

0.87

The correlation between EQQU.L and ANXU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.87 (all time) to 1.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQQU.L vs. ANXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQQU.L
ANXU.L

Technology

57.9%
53.7%

Communication Services

14.5%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
7.7%

Healthcare

3.7%
4.2%

Industrials

2.8%
3.1%

Utilities

1.2%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.1%

Energy

0.5%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.1%

Technology

EQQU.L
57.9%
ANXU.L
53.7%

Communication Services

EQQU.L
14.5%
ANXU.L
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EQQU.L
11.6%
ANXU.L
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

EQQU.L
6.6%
ANXU.L
7.7%

Healthcare

EQQU.L
3.7%
ANXU.L
4.2%

Industrials

EQQU.L
2.8%
ANXU.L
3.1%

Utilities

EQQU.L
1.2%
ANXU.L
1.4%

Basic Materials

EQQU.L
1.0%
ANXU.L
1.1%

Energy

EQQU.L
0.5%
ANXU.L
0.6%

Financial Services

EQQU.L
0.2%
ANXU.L
0.2%

Real Estate

EQQU.L
0.0%
ANXU.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQQU.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQU.L
EQQU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ANXU.L
ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQU.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQQU.LANXU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

3.66

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

13.14

-0.10

EQQU.L vs. ANXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQU.L and ANXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQQU.LANXU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.54

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.86

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

1.17

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

1.19

-0.24

Drawdowns

EQQU.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQU.L drawdown since its inception was -35.17%, roughly equal to the maximum ANXU.L drawdown of -35.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQU.L and ANXU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQQU.LANXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.17%

-35.13%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-11.01%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.30%

-22.45%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.17%

-35.13%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.17%

-35.13%

-0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.77%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-5.77%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

3.08%

0.00%

Volatility

EQQU.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) have volatilities of 4.93% and 5.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQQU.LANXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

5.03%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.88%

11.93%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

15.91%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

20.79%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.97%

21.15%

-1.18%

EQQU.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQQU.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison

EQQU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while ANXU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.26%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, EQQU.L and ANXU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQU.L.

EQQU.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQQU.L and 0.13% for ANXU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQQU.L and ANXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer