EQQS.L vs. R1GB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L).
EQQS.L and R1GB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQQS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ - 100 Notional NTR Index. It was launched on Jun 21, 2021. R1GB.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2023. Both EQQS.L and R1GB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EQQS.L vs. R1GB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EQQS.L vs. R1GB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EQQS.L Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | -5.48% | 19.85% | 4.52% |
R1GB.L iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc | -9.66% | 17.73% | -15.89% |
Different Trading Currencies
EQQS.L is traded in USD, while R1GB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the R1GB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQQS.L achieves a -5.48% return, which is significantly higher than R1GB.L's -9.62% return.
EQQS.L
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -5.48%
- 6M
- -3.18%
- 1Y
- 23.50%
- 3Y*
- 23.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
R1GB.L
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- YTD
- -9.62%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- 1Y
- 18.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQQS.L vs. R1GB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQQS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than R1GB.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EQQS.L vs. R1GB.L — Risk / Return Rank
EQQS.L
R1GB.L
EQQS.L vs. R1GB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQQS.L | R1GB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.95 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 1.46 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 1.15 | +1.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.59 | 4.02 | +5.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQQS.L | R1GB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.95 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | -0.24 | +0.86 |
Correlation
The correlation between EQQS.L and R1GB.L is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EQQS.L vs. R1GB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EQQS.L nor R1GB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EQQS.L vs. R1GB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQQS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, roughly equal to the maximum R1GB.L drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQS.L and R1GB.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQQS.L | R1GB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -33.43% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -15.75% | +4.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.90% | -14.18% | +6.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -16.33% | +7.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 5.28% | -2.29% |
Volatility
EQQS.L vs. R1GB.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L) have volatilities of 5.66% and 5.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EQQS.L | R1GB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 5.55% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.94% | 11.78% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 19.80% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.62% | 25.42% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.62% | 25.42% | -2.80% |