PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQQS.L vs. EQQD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EQQS.L vs. EQQD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EQQS.L vs. EQQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EQQS.L
Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
-5.09%19.85%26.77%55.63%-33.47%16.15%
EQQD.L
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist
-5.23%19.91%26.75%56.61%-33.32%15.15%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EQQS.L having a -5.09% return and EQQD.L slightly lower at -5.23%.


EQQS.L

1D
3.38%
1M
-3.03%
YTD
-5.09%
6M
-2.18%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
10Y*

EQQD.L

1D
3.25%
1M
-3.01%
YTD
-5.23%
6M
-2.24%
1Y
24.66%
3Y*
23.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQQS.L vs. EQQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EQQS.L and EQQD.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

EQQS.L vs. EQQD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQS.L
EQQS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EQQS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQD.L
EQQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EQQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQS.L vs. EQQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQQS.LEQQD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

1.85

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.13

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.86

7.83

+0.02

EQQS.L vs. EQQD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the EQQD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQS.L and EQQD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQQS.LEQQD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.58

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between EQQS.L and EQQD.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EQQS.L vs. EQQD.L - Dividend Comparison

EQQS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.


TTM20252024202320222021
EQQS.L
Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQQD.L
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist
0.69%0.64%0.75%0.75%0.95%0.31%

Drawdowns

EQQS.L vs. EQQD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, roughly equal to the maximum EQQD.L drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQS.L and EQQD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EQQS.LEQQD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.93%

-34.95%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.93%

-12.48%

+0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.52%

-7.62%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-9.38%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.04%

+0.02%

Volatility

EQQS.L vs. EQQD.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) have volatilities of 6.06% and 5.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EQQS.LEQQD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

5.93%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

11.84%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.63%

19.68%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.63%

20.85%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.63%

20.85%

+1.78%