PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQQQ.L vs. WTCH.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQQQ.L vs. WTCH.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQQQ.L is traded in GBp, while WTCH.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WTCH.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQQQ.L achieves a 20.61% return, which is significantly lower than WTCH.AS's 26.87% return. Over the past 10 years, EQQQ.L has underperformed WTCH.AS with an annualized return of 22.67%, while WTCH.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 25.51% annualized return.


EQQQ.L

1D
0.19%
1M
11.85%
YTD
20.61%
6M
18.88%
1Y
42.65%
3Y*
25.32%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
22.67%

WTCH.AS

1D
-0.51%
1M
19.00%
YTD
26.87%
6M
25.42%
1Y
55.98%
3Y*
30.54%
5Y*
23.12%
10Y*
25.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQQ.L vs. WTCH.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
20.61%11.54%28.55%47.79%-25.54%29.59%43.32%33.69%4.64%20.12%
WTCH.AS
SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF
26.87%14.21%36.87%46.11%-23.93%32.52%39.24%40.95%2.92%26.44%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQQ.L and WTCH.AS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.91

The correlation between EQQQ.L and WTCH.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQQQ.L vs. WTCH.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

WTCH.AS
WTCH.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WTCH.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQQ.L vs. WTCH.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQQQ.LWTCH.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.46

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

3.34

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.41

8.63

+2.78

EQQQ.L vs. WTCH.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the WTCH.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQQ.L and WTCH.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQQQ.LWTCH.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.79

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

1.04

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

1.19

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.22

-0.30

Drawdowns

EQQQ.L vs. WTCH.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, which is greater than WTCH.AS's maximum drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQQ.L and WTCH.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQQQ.LWTCH.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.75%

-28.40%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-16.51%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-28.40%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.76%

-28.40%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.76%

-28.40%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.51%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-5.65%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

6.43%

-2.70%

Volatility

EQQQ.L vs. WTCH.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) is 4.09%, while SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that EQQQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTCH.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQQQ.LWTCH.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

6.92%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

14.53%

-4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

19.86%

-5.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

21.94%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

21.23%

-1.88%

EQQQ.L vs. WTCH.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EQQQ.L and WTCH.AS have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

EQQQ.L vs. WTCH.AS - Dividend Comparison

EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while WTCH.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
WTCH.AS
SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EQQQ.L and WTCH.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQQ.L and WTCH.AS have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

EQQQ.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while WTCH.AS is Technology Equities. EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while WTCH.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQQQ.L and WTCH.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer