PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQQQ.L vs. QDVE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQQQ.L vs. QDVE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQQQ.L is traded in GBp, while QDVE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QDVE.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EQQQ.L having a 17.18% return and QDVE.DE slightly higher at 17.55%. Over the past 10 years, EQQQ.L has underperformed QDVE.DE with an annualized return of 22.24%, while QDVE.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 26.66% annualized return.


EQQQ.L

1D
2.53%
1M
0.63%
YTD
17.18%
6M
17.41%
1Y
38.39%
3Y*
23.63%
5Y*
17.89%
10Y*
22.24%

QDVE.DE

1D
2.50%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
17.55%
6M
18.74%
1Y
45.44%
3Y*
28.77%
5Y*
23.91%
10Y*
26.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQQ.L vs. QDVE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
17.18%11.54%28.55%47.79%-25.54%29.59%43.32%33.69%4.64%20.12%
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
17.55%15.73%39.72%51.09%-21.75%36.39%36.99%45.89%4.54%26.06%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQQ.L and QDVE.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2015

0.91

The correlation between EQQQ.L and QDVE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQQQ.L vs. QDVE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVE.DE
QDVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQQ.L vs. QDVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQQQ.LQDVE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.36

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.70

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.90

6.86

+3.04

EQQQ.L vs. QDVE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQQ.L and QDVE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQQQ.L vs. QDVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -65.36%, which is greater than QDVE.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQQ.L and QDVE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQQQ.LQDVE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.36%

-28.27%

-37.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-16.44%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-28.27%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.76%

-28.27%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.76%

-28.27%

+0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-7.24%

+4.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.50%

-5.20%

-7.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

6.49%

-2.70%

Volatility

EQQQ.L vs. QDVE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) is 5.78%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) has a volatility of 8.14%. This indicates that EQQQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQQQ.LQDVE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

8.14%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

15.22%

-4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

20.47%

-5.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

22.30%

-3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

21.62%

-2.23%

EQQQ.L vs. QDVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQQ.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVE.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQQQ.L vs. QDVE.DE - Dividend Comparison

EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while QDVE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQQQ.L and QDVE.DE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

EQQQ.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QDVE.DE is Technology Equities. EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QDVE.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQQQ.L and 0.15% for QDVE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQQQ.L and QDVE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer