PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQQQ.L vs. IGDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQQQ.L vs. IGDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQQQ.L is traded in GBp, while IGDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQQQ.L achieves a 20.61% return, which is significantly higher than IGDA.L's 16.46% return.


EQQQ.L

1D
0.19%
1M
11.85%
YTD
20.61%
6M
18.88%
1Y
42.65%
3Y*
25.32%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
22.67%

IGDA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
8.96%
YTD
16.46%
6M
16.36%
1Y
37.83%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQQ.L vs. IGDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
20.61%11.54%28.55%47.79%-14.53%
IGDA.L
Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc
16.03%10.28%20.00%23.23%-5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQQ.L and IGDA.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022

0.80

The correlation between EQQQ.L and IGDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQQQ.L vs. IGDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQQQ.L
IGDA.L

Technology

57.9%
41.4%

Communication Services

14.5%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
4.7%

Healthcare

3.7%
11.3%

Industrials

2.8%
10.8%

Utilities

1.2%
0.3%

Basic Materials

1.0%
4.7%

Energy

0.5%
3.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
2.1%

Real Estate

0.0%
1.0%

Technology

EQQQ.L
57.9%
IGDA.L
41.4%

Communication Services

EQQQ.L
14.5%
IGDA.L
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EQQQ.L
11.6%
IGDA.L
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

EQQQ.L
6.6%
IGDA.L
4.7%

Healthcare

EQQQ.L
3.7%
IGDA.L
11.3%

Industrials

EQQQ.L
2.8%
IGDA.L
10.8%

Utilities

EQQQ.L
1.2%
IGDA.L
0.3%

Basic Materials

EQQQ.L
1.0%
IGDA.L
4.7%

Energy

EQQQ.L
0.5%
IGDA.L
3.6%

Financial Services

EQQQ.L
0.2%
IGDA.L
2.1%

Real Estate

EQQQ.L
0.0%
IGDA.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQQQ.L vs. IGDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IGDA.L
IGDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQQ.L vs. IGDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQQQ.LIGDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.50

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

5.23

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.41

18.72

-7.31

EQQQ.L vs. IGDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQQ.L and IGDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQQQ.LIGDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.76

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.92

0.00

Drawdowns

EQQQ.L vs. IGDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, which is greater than IGDA.L's maximum drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQQ.L and IGDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQQQ.LIGDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.75%

-22.43%

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-7.20%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-22.43%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-3.93%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

2.02%

+1.71%

Volatility

EQQQ.L vs. IGDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) is 4.09%, while Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that EQQQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQQQ.LIGDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

4.45%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

10.27%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

13.66%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

17.32%

+1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

17.32%

+2.03%

EQQQ.L vs. IGDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQQ.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IGDA.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQQQ.L vs. IGDA.L - Dividend Comparison

EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while IGDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
IGDA.L
Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQQQ.L and IGDA.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQQQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IGDA.L.

EQQQ.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IGDA.L is Global Equities. EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while IGDA.L tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQQQ.L and 0.40% for IGDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQQQ.L and IGDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer