PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQQQ.L vs. EXXT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQQQ.L vs. EXXT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQQQ.L is traded in GBp, while EXXT.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EXXT.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EQQQ.L having a 19.86% return and EXXT.DE slightly lower at 19.62%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EQQQ.L having a 22.47% annualized return and EXXT.DE not far behind at 22.31%.


EQQQ.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
9.63%
YTD
19.86%
6M
18.38%
1Y
41.62%
3Y*
24.65%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
22.47%

EXXT.DE

1D
-0.70%
1M
9.55%
YTD
19.62%
6M
18.26%
1Y
41.43%
3Y*
24.66%
5Y*
18.78%
10Y*
22.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQQ.L vs. EXXT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
19.86%11.54%28.55%47.79%-25.54%29.59%43.32%33.69%4.64%20.12%
EXXT.DE
iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
19.62%12.43%27.69%48.25%-26.28%29.26%42.13%35.36%4.35%20.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQQ.L and EXXT.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007

0.88

The correlation between EQQQ.L and EXXT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQQQ.L vs. EXXT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

EXXT.DE
EXXT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EXXT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQQ.L vs. EXXT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQQQ.LEXXT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.47

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

3.71

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

10.74

+0.40

EQQQ.L vs. EXXT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the EXXT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQQ.L and EXXT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQQQ.LEXXT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

2.70

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.95

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.16

1.13

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.90

+0.02

Drawdowns

EQQQ.L vs. EXXT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, roughly equal to the maximum EXXT.DE drawdown of -35.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQQ.L and EXXT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQQQ.LEXXT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.75%

-35.22%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-11.13%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-25.08%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.76%

-27.77%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.76%

-27.77%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.70%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-5.55%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

3.85%

-0.12%

Volatility

EQQQ.L vs. EXXT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) is 4.15%, while iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXT.DE) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that EQQQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXXT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQQQ.LEXXT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

4.53%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

10.71%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

15.27%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

19.46%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

19.64%

-0.29%

EQQQ.L vs. EXXT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQQ.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EXXT.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQQQ.L vs. EXXT.DE - Dividend Comparison

EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, more than EXXT.DE's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
EXXT.DE
iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
0.15%0.19%0.26%0.53%0.41%0.15%0.32%0.40%0.28%1.84%0.84%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EQQQ.L and EXXT.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EQQQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EXXT.DE.

EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while EXXT.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQQQ.L and 0.31% for EXXT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQQQ.L and EXXT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer