PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQQQ.L vs. BTCE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQQQ.L vs. BTCE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQQQ.L is traded in GBp, while BTCE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the BTCE.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQQQ.L achieves a 17.18% return, which is significantly higher than BTCE.DE's -27.62% return.


EQQQ.L

1D
2.53%
1M
0.63%
YTD
17.18%
6M
17.41%
1Y
38.39%
3Y*
23.63%
5Y*
17.89%
10Y*
22.24%

BTCE.DE

1D
-3.72%
1M
-21.26%
YTD
-27.62%
6M
-30.02%
1Y
-40.04%
3Y*
28.21%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQQ.L vs. BTCE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
17.18%11.54%28.55%47.79%-25.54%29.59%18.11%
BTCE.DE
ETC Group Physical Bitcoin
-27.62%-13.94%115.95%141.60%-61.91%68.57%162.36%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQQ.L and BTCE.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQQQ.L vs. BTCE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCE.DE
BTCE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BTCE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQQ.L vs. BTCE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQQQ.LBTCE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.84

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

-0.81

+4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.90

-1.41

+11.31

EQQQ.L vs. BTCE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the BTCE.DE Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQQ.L and BTCE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQQQ.L vs. BTCE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -65.36%, smaller than the maximum BTCE.DE drawdown of -74.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQQ.L and BTCE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQQQ.LBTCE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.36%

-74.21%

+8.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-49.53%

+38.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-49.53%

+25.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.76%

-74.21%

+46.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-49.50%

+46.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.50%

-30.36%

+17.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

28.44%

-24.65%

Volatility

EQQQ.L vs. BTCE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) is 5.78%, while ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) has a volatility of 10.20%. This indicates that EQQQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQQQ.LBTCE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

10.20%

-4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

30.63%

-19.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

39.31%

-24.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

52.25%

-33.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

57.52%

-38.13%

EQQQ.L vs. BTCE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQQ.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCE.DE's 2.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQQQ.L vs. BTCE.DE - Dividend Comparison

EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while BTCE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTCE.DE
ETC Group Physical Bitcoin
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQQQ.L and BTCE.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQQQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 2.00% for BTCE.DE.

EQQQ.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BTCE.DE is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ETC Issuance. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQQQ.L and 2.00% for BTCE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQQQ.L and BTCE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer