PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQQJ.L vs. FINX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQQJ.L vs. FINX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Next Generation 100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQJ.L) and Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FINX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQQJ.L achieves a 18.08% return, which is significantly higher than FINX.L's -15.02% return.


EQQJ.L

1D
-0.97%
1M
-2.37%
6M
11.24%
YTD
18.08%
1Y
34.66%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*

FINX.L

1D
-3.30%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-13.54%
YTD
-15.02%
1Y
-27.34%
3Y*
1.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQJ.L vs. FINX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EQQJ.L
Invesco NASDAQ Next Generation 100 UCITS ETF Acc
18.08%20.31%14.94%14.56%-28.82%-5.89%
FINX.L
Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-15.02%-5.95%22.04%36.70%-52.82%-16.40%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQJ.L and FINX.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.82

The correlation between EQQJ.L and FINX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQQJ.L vs. FINX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQJ.L
EQQJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EQQJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FINX.L
FINX.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FINX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FINX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQJ.L vs. FINX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Generation 100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQJ.L) and Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FINX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQQJ.LFINX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.86

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

-0.75

+3.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.04

-1.23

+13.27

EQQJ.L vs. FINX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the FINX.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQJ.L and FINX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQQJ.L vs. FINX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQJ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, smaller than the maximum FINX.L drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQJ.L and FINX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQQJ.LFINX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.51%

-62.08%

+23.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-36.51%

+25.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.96%

-36.51%

+13.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

-47.41%

+42.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.35%

-44.53%

+28.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

22.11%

-19.24%

Volatility

EQQJ.L vs. FINX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Next Generation 100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQJ.L) is 4.99%, while Global X FinTech UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FINX.L) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that EQQJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FINX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQQJ.LFINX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.99%

8.96%

-3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.85%

24.25%

-9.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.04%

29.59%

-11.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.35%

31.33%

-9.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.26%

31.33%

-10.07%

EQQJ.L vs. FINX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FINX.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQQJ.L vs. FINX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EQQJ.L nor FINX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EQQJ.L and FINX.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQQJ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQJ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FINX.L.

EQQJ.L is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while FINX.L is Technology Equities. EQQJ.L tracks Nasdaq Next Generation 100 Index, while FINX.L tracks Indxx Global FinTech Thematic v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EQQJ.L and 0.60% for FINX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQQJ.L and FINX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer