PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQQB.DE vs. WDTE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQQB.DE vs. WDTE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE) and Invesco S&P World Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDTE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQQB.DE achieves a 20.54% return, which is significantly higher than WDTE.DE's 18.32% return.


EQQB.DE

1D
-0.82%
1M
7.97%
YTD
20.54%
6M
18.70%
1Y
36.95%
3Y*
24.52%
5Y*
10Y*

WDTE.DE

1D
-2.54%
1M
10.74%
YTD
18.32%
6M
17.59%
1Y
35.87%
3Y*
25.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQB.DE vs. WDTE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EQQB.DE
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc
20.54%6.93%33.67%28.75%
WDTE.DE
Invesco S&P World Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF Acc
18.32%6.19%42.11%32.17%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQB.DE and WDTE.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.93

The correlation between EQQB.DE and WDTE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQQB.DE vs. WDTE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQB.DE
EQQB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EQQB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

WDTE.DE
WDTE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
WDTE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDTE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDTE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
WDTE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDTE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQB.DE vs. WDTE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE) and Invesco S&P World Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDTE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQQB.DEWDTE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

2.33

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.10

6.14

+4.96

EQQB.DE vs. WDTE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the WDTE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQB.DE and WDTE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQQB.DEWDTE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.88

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

1.44

-0.47

Drawdowns

EQQB.DE vs. WDTE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQB.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.59%, smaller than the maximum WDTE.DE drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQB.DE and WDTE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQQB.DEWDTE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.59%

-28.19%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-15.79%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.59%

-28.19%

+1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-3.63%

+2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-4.97%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

5.99%

-2.60%

Volatility

EQQB.DE vs. WDTE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (EQQB.DE) is 4.38%, while Invesco S&P World Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDTE.DE) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that EQQB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDTE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQQB.DEWDTE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

8.26%

-3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

15.09%

-4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

19.51%

-3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.97%

21.74%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.97%

21.74%

-1.77%

EQQB.DE vs. WDTE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQB.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than WDTE.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQQB.DE vs. WDTE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EQQB.DE nor WDTE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, EQQB.DE and WDTE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, WDTE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDTE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQB.DE.

EQQB.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while WDTE.DE is Technology Equities. EQQB.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while WDTE.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap ESG Enhanced Information Technology. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQQB.DE and 0.18% for WDTE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQQB.DE and WDTE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer