PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQNIX vs. NEIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQNIX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Equity Income Fund (EQNIX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQNIX achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly lower than NEIMX's 15.83% return. Over the past 10 years, EQNIX has outperformed NEIMX with an annualized return of 12.61%, while NEIMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.20% annualized return.


EQNIX

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.65%
YTD
12.78%
6M
14.91%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
12.61%

NEIMX

1D
-0.40%
1M
3.16%
YTD
15.83%
6M
16.30%
1Y
33.22%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQNIX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQNIX
MFS Equity Income Fund
12.78%16.90%12.89%16.23%-6.97%26.35%8.59%25.72%-7.55%19.34%
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
15.83%18.68%13.50%6.15%-5.16%23.85%-5.97%23.49%-9.76%19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EQNIX and NEIMX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.91

The correlation between EQNIX and NEIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQNIX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQNIX
EQNIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EQNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EQNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NEIMX
NEIMX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NEIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQNIX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Equity Income Fund (EQNIX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQNIXNEIMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

3.36

-0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.38

4.65

-1.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.62

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

5.91

-2.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.87

24.73

-10.86

EQNIX vs. NEIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQNIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the NEIMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQNIX and NEIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQNIXNEIMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

3.36

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.02

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.03

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.03

+0.73

Drawdowns

EQNIX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQNIX drawdown since its inception was -36.60%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQNIX and NEIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQNIXNEIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.60%

-92.94%

+56.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.94%

-5.75%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-92.94%

+76.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.64%

-92.94%

+74.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.60%

-92.94%

+56.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-89.12%

+88.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-10.50%

+7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.37%

+0.64%

Volatility

EQNIX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Equity Income Fund (EQNIX) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) at 2.50%. This indicates that EQNIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQNIXNEIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.50%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

7.75%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

10.14%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.92%

576.30%

-561.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

407.70%

-390.56%

EQNIX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQNIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQNIX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison

EQNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.79%, more than NEIMX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQNIX
MFS Equity Income Fund
10.79%12.17%6.60%4.05%6.24%8.38%3.71%2.29%7.27%4.75%2.42%2.89%
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
0.65%0.76%1.10%1.36%3.60%17.65%1.20%2.26%1.20%6.64%10.20%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQNIX and NEIMX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQNIX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to NEIMX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQNIX dropped -36.60% vs NEIMX's -92.94%.

NEIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQNIX and NEIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer