EQNIX vs. FGINX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Equity Income Fund (EQNIX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX).
EQNIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Sep 27, 2012. FGINX is managed by Delaware Funds. It was launched on Oct 4, 1993.
Performance
EQNIX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EQNIX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQNIX MFS Equity Income Fund | 2.75% | 16.90% | 12.89% | 16.23% | -6.97% | 26.35% | 8.59% | 25.72% | -7.55% | 19.34% |
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund | 4.63% | 29.78% | 15.13% | 11.98% | 3.03% | 21.37% | -0.08% | 25.64% | -10.27% | 18.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQNIX achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 4.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EQNIX having a 11.73% annualized return and FGINX not far ahead at 12.18%.
EQNIX
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 5.08%
- 1Y
- 19.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
FGINX
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 29.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQNIX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQNIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EQNIX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank
EQNIX
FGINX
EQNIX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Equity Income Fund (EQNIX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQNIX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.84 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 2.47 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 2.55 | -0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.33 | 10.90 | -3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQNIX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.84 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 1.01 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.72 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.53 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between EQNIX and FGINX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EQNIX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison
EQNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.84%, more than FGINX's 10.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQNIX MFS Equity Income Fund | 11.84% | 12.17% | 6.60% | 4.05% | 6.24% | 8.38% | 3.71% | 2.29% | 7.27% | 4.75% | 2.42% | 2.89% |
FGINX Delaware Growth and Income Fund | 10.86% | 11.28% | 12.40% | 7.11% | 7.04% | 11.97% | 6.59% | 51.75% | 25.36% | 5.13% | 4.12% | 5.66% |
Drawdowns
EQNIX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQNIX drawdown since its inception was -36.60%, smaller than the maximum FGINX drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQNIX and FGINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQNIX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.60% | -54.80% | +18.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -11.56% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.64% | -16.21% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.60% | -37.37% | +0.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.76% | -5.46% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -9.74% | +6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 2.70% | +0.11% |
Volatility
EQNIX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Equity Income Fund (EQNIX) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) at 4.24%. This indicates that EQNIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EQNIX | FGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 4.24% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 9.01% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 16.22% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 14.88% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 17.04% | +0.09% |